Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Femto Bot: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:45, 30 September 2010

Latest revision as of 10:35, 9 February 2023

(13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)

Line 1:

<noinclude>[[Category:OpenApproved Wikipedia bot requests for approval|{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1|3}}Femto Bot]]</noinclude><div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:

#A0FFA0; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at [[WT:BRFA]].'' The result of the discussion was [[File:Symbol keep vote.svg|20px]] '''Approved'''.<!-- from Template:Bot Top-->

==[[User:Femto Bot|Femto Bot]]==

{{Newbot|Femto Bot}}

Line 41 ⟶ 43:

<!-- This is not a vote. It is a discussion -->

This is a non-controversial small task suited for a tiny bot like Femto Bot. Test edits can be seen in the Bot's contribs, speedy approval will enable a number of outstanding cats to be created. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 20:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC).

:{{takenote}} I've just unblocked the bot, but it should not run until trial/task is approved. –[[user:xeno|<fontspan facestyle="font-family:verdana"; color=":black;">'''xeno'''</fontspan>]][[user talk:xeno|<fontsup colorstyle="color:black;">^talk</font>]] 21:45, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

::TY, approval for 50 edit trial would be useful. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 21:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC).

:::Ok, have at it. {{BotTrial|50 edits}} –[[user:xeno|<span style="font-family:verdana; color:black;">'''xeno'''</span>]][[user talk:xeno|<sup style="color:black;">talk</sup>]] 21:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

::::Thanks, fingers crossed. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 23:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC).

:::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Femto_Bot 38 edits here]. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 23:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC).

::::::<s>It's doing funky things [[:Category:Articles_with_a_promotional_tone_from_October_2010|here]]. What exactly is the MCUC 1211?</s> It's not the bot, it's the template that the bot is using. [[User:Netalarm|<span style="color:#00AA11;">'''Netalarm'''</span>]]^{[[User talk:Netalarm|<span style="color:#FF9933;">'''talk'''</span>]]} 05:15, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

::::::::Yes, that's a diagnostic I put in, should only show on [[:Category:BLP articles lacking sources from June 2006]] now, it illustrates a template problem - question posted at [[WP:VPT]]. Any template geniuses, or people good at spotting silly mistakes are invited to take a look. I'm currently baffled but just waiting for someone to tell me it's an obvious typo. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 08:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC).

:::::::::Yawn... worked around that issue, but it's stil a 0=1 type of thing. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 14:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC).<br />

:::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Femto_Bot 48 edits here]. Approval would be nice before it gets to 51 and I'm technically in breach of the Geneva Convention again. ''[[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Rich Farmbrough|Farmbrough]]'', 14:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC).<br />

{{BotApproved}} Seems to be working. Uncontroversial task - [[User:Kingpin13|Kingpin]]^{[[Special:Contributions/Kingpin13|13]]} ([[User talk:Kingpin13|talk]]) 11:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at [[WT:BRFA]].''<!-- from Template:Bot Bottom --></div>