Wikipedia:Featured article review/Algorithm: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:19, 9 February 2017

Latest revision as of 22:18, 9 February 2023

Line 25:

***The page in question is the entry point for a big amout of articles about Algos. I the page is removed of featured list of article, we need for another page to replace it (in this list) as entry point. Of course the page itself must be valuable. Secondly, the guideline allow to add external links and they are part of content of the page. Removing them is vandalism. There is now just 2 links in this article. Can't be justified. [[User:Splang|Splang]] 06:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

*'''Remove'''. It's not horrible but it's not good enough for featured status. It really needs more careful referencing. [[User:Haukurth|Haukur]] 14:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

*<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">'''Invalid nomination'''</fontspan>—No notice, as required, has been provided on the talk page. A directive that the article "must be rewritten in a langage with a more conventionnal syntax" has recently appeared, but that does not fulfill the requirements here; nor does a "to do" list from some time ago. [[User:Tony1|Tony]] 02:21, 16 May 2006 (UTC)