Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crisspy: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:23, 22 July 2006

Latest revision as of 20:44, 10 February 2023

(37 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata rfa" style="background-color: #fff5f5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[wikipedia:requests for adminship|request for adminship]] that '''did not succeed'''. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>''[[Category:Unsuccessful requests for adminship|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]

===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crisspy|Crisspy]]===

'''Final (4/15/0) ended 18:40, 22 July 2006'''

'''[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Crisspy|action=edit}} Vote here] (0/1/0)'''

'''Ending 04:06, [[2006-07-28]] (UTC)'''

{{User|Crisspy}} – A hardworking person who has created and contributed to many articles in countless topics. [[User:Crisspy|Crisspy]] 04:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)Crisspy

Line 8 ⟶ 10:

<!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered Wikipedians may vote. Nominees should not vote for themselves. See [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship]] for more.-->

;Support

# '''Support''' I think that Crisspy would make a good admin. Wikipedia is '''way''' too bureaucratic and Crisspy would stop that.[[User:'sed|&#39;sed]] 16:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

#*Interestingly this user's first edit [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deskana&diff=prev&oldid=59188295] admits sockpuppetry, and that he and [[User:Crisspy|Crisspy]] had created a joint account for the purposes of "revenge" against an admin. [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 17:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

too bureaucratic and Crisspy would stop that.[[User:'sed|&#39;sed]] 16:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

# '''Support''' I'd vote for Crisspy b/c he does 3 strikes instead of 1 strike.[[User:The mann hu new 2 much|The mann hu new 2 much]] 01:54, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#* Note this vote is editors first edit. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]^{([[User_talk:Pgk|<span style="color:mediumseagreen;">talk</span>]])} 16:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

# ''' Strongest Possible Support''' I think Crisspy is incredibly eligible for admin. He did not realize that no campaigning is allowed, so that would explain the links that the opposing parties show. He gave strong answers to all of the questions, using the three-strike method for promising justice. He has dedicated a lot of his effort, work and time to wikipedia, and that's what makes a terrific, respectable admin. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Armando341|Armando341]] ([[User talk:Armando341|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Armando341|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small>

#: '''Comment''' The fact that he did not realize he shouldn't campaign, shows he can't have read the [[WP:GRFA|Guide to RfA]] properly, as it clearly advises against it. If the candidate can't even nominate himself correctly, why should anyone have confidence he'll not abuse the admin tools inadvertently? [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 16:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

# '''Strong Support''' I have done some research, and Crisspy is just what we need for an admin: hardworking, respectful, dedicated, and intelligent. He will make sure that wikipedia stays in great condition, and he will deal with rulebreakers with justice and fairness. [[user:Mark ritzchkin|Mark ritzchkin]]

#* Note editor has < 50 edits and this is first edit in a month. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]^{([[User_talk:Pgk|<span style="color:mediumseagreen;">talk</span>]])} 16:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#*Also an alleged member of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deskana&diff=prev&oldid=59188295 joint account] with users 'sed and Crisspy. [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 17:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

;Oppose

#'''Strongest Possible Oppose''' - not listed properly on the main RFA page, weak answer to question 1, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Keithgreer&curid=2101852&diff=65161165&oldid=64118571 spamming user talk pages] with this RFA, general inexperience (only 267 mainspace edits, oldest one at 31 March 2006), odd three-strike proposal which demonstrates lack of basic understanding of existing warning policies and practices. ([[User:ESkog|ESkog]])^{([[User talk:ESkog|Talk]])} 05:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''', [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_adminship&diff=65225155&oldid=65188943 Malformed] nomination. [[User:Naconkantari|<fontspan colorstyle="color:red;">Nacon</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:gray;">'''kantari'''</fontspan>]] 16:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' inexperience as demonstrated by malformed nom. --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]^{([[User_talk:Pgk|<span style="color:mediumseagreen;">talk</span>]])} 16:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#* Additionally edits like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACrisspy&diff=51804646&oldid=51804400 this], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Night_Gyr&diff=prev&oldid=57648519 this], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Deskana&diff=prev&oldid=57433846 this] and creation of attack articles such as [[ACAR club]] (since deleted) --[[User:Pgk|pgk]]^{([[User_talk:Pgk|<span style="color:mediumseagreen;">talk</span>]])} 16:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' per ESkog. --<span style="background:gold;">[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">S</span>]][[User:Siva1979|iva1979]]</span>[[User talk:Siva1979|<sup style="background:yellow;">Talk to me</sup>]] 16:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Strong oppose''' sorry, but if you can't follow the instructions to correctly list your RfA, I have no confidence in your abilities to correctly use the mop. The campaigning for your RfA is also a bad idea and you edit count is too low for me to support you. [[User:Gwernol|Gwernol]] 16:45, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Strong Oppose''' Malformed RfA, inapropriate campaigning, No project space edits outside of RfA, creation of inapropriate redirects to User page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guille_Tin&diff=prev&oldid=62967479], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guille&diff=prev&oldid=62967584], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crisspy&diff=prev&oldid=60371210] conclusively demonstrate lack of necessary policy knowledge and experience to be an admin. [[User:Eluchil404|Eluchil404]] 16:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' Don't meet my standards and isn't an exception, like ikiroid, but I thought he was a sysop so I voted for him. [[user:GangstaEB|<span style="color:black;">Gang</span>]][[user talk:GangstaEB|<span style="color:red;">sta</span>]][[Special:Contributions/GangstaEB|<span style="color:green;">EB</span>]] ([[user:GangstaEB/PenguinLog#Ice Slides|sliding logs]]~[[user:GangstaEB/PenguinLog#Dives|dive logs]]) 16:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Stronger than the strongest possible oppose'''. Can some please de-list this RfA? [[User:Themindset|Themindset]] 17:02, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' Sorry, I never like opposing, but less than 1000 edits really is too little for an RfA. Also seems not to know even the bare minmum of policy required for admiship. I'm sure you're a good user Crisspy, why not just wait a bit longer 'till you ask for the tools again? [[User:The Halo|Th]][[User:The Halo/Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">ε</span>]][[User:The Halo| Halo]] ^{[[User talk:The Halo|'''Θ''']]} 17:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' per the evidence provided by Eluchil404, Nakonkantari, others. No offence; you seem like a good user, you just need a little more experience.--[[User:Firsfron|<span style="color:#999fff;">Firsfron of Ronchester</span>]] 17:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Strong Oppose''' - Advertising an RFA by spamming people is an auto oppose out of me, vandalistic looking edits trouble me too, in short, no way -- [[User:Tawker|Tawker]] 17:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''[[WP:SNOWBALL]] please, oppose''' [[User:Computerjoe|Computerjoe]][[User talk:Computerjoe|<span style="color:red">'s talk</span>]] 17:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#[[User:Merovingian|M]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<span style="color:green;">'''e'''</span>]][[User:Merovingian|rovingian]] ([[User talk:Merovingian|T]], [[Special:Contributions/Merovingian|C]], [[Special:Emailuser/Merovingian|@]]) 17:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' per all above --[[User:Guinnog|Guinnog]] 17:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' too new. Please come back when you have more experience. [[User:SynergeticMaggot|SynergeticMaggot]] 17:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

#'''Oppose''' and add my voice to the call for a close to this RfA. [[User:Ifnord|Ifnord]] 18:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

;Neutral

Line 26 ⟶ 45:

<!-- begin editcount box-->

*See [[User:Crisspy|Crisspy]]'s edit summary usage with [http://www.math.ucla.edu/~aoleg/wp/rfa/edit_summary.cgi?user=Crisspy&lang=en mathbot's tool].

*See [[User:Crisspy|Crisspy]]'s edit history with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js?username=Crisspy Interoit's tool 2]

<pre>

Username Crisspy

Total edits 563

Distinct pages edited 125

Average edits/page 4.504

First edit 05:19, March 31, 2006

(main) 292

Talk 9

User 177

User talk 76

Category 3

Wikipedia 6

</pre>

<!-- end edit count box -->

*

Line 39 ⟶ 73:

:'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

::'''A:'''To be honest, I have gotten in one small conflict with another wikipedian, (exchanging insults and verbal attacks by both) because he was giving my friend a hard time about one of his contributions. But, I resolved my differences with that user, and we actually became friends. Apparently, he and I both loved music and Cuisine. If I, by some tiny chance, become an admin, I will make sure to deal with vandals or other stress-causing users the way I deal with ordinary people: use the three-strike method. Because, if the user is new, he/she might be unjustly blocked, and that could put me in a bad image. This could also lead to more vandalism by friends of that user, or one of its sockpuppets. So, I would warn them once, with a calm but firm warning, and warn them a second time with a stricter one. The third time, I would block them indefinitely or however temporary the punishment fits the crime.

:''The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either [[{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|this nomination]] or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>