Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NSR: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
|||
(16 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
This user is a sockpuppet of [[User:Norm]], who got blocked for page move vandalism.
===[[User:NSR|NSR]]===
'''
{{User|NSR}}
Line 11 ⟶ 13:
#'''Support''' [[User:Journalist|Journalist]] 18:43, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Much respect to helpers of WikiProject Missing Articles. [[User:TheCoffee|Coffee]] 18:46, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Dbraceyrules|D. J. Bracey]] [[User_talk:Dbraceyrules|(talk)]] [[Image:
#[[User:Merovingian|
#'''Support''' - Fits [[User:Celestianpower/Adminship|my criteria]].
#'''Support'''. Fine user. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 15:06, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Tons of edits for someone who has only been here three months. [[User:Acetic Acid|Acetic Acid]] 21:11, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Even closes VfDs and not even an admin yet! Like some kind of strange preminition.... --<small>[[User:RN|Ryan Norton]] <sup
#'''Support''' [[User:Morhange|Morhange]] 01:12, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
#Seems to me like a good user. [[User:Andrevan|<b
#'''Support'''. Not bad at all. I myself started off as an anonymous editor for months on end, and then I got crazy enough to register a username. Before I reached my 3rd month mark, I was nominated and elected for adminship. I don't see why you shouldn't be any different, given the fact that you're an active editor and vandal-fighter. [[User:Linuxbeak|Linuxbeak]] | [[User_talk:Linuxbeak|Talk]] | [[User:Linuxbeak/Desk|Desk]] 14:45, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
'''Oppose'''
#'''Oppose'''- hasn't been here long enough. [[User:Astrotrain|Astrotrain]] 19:48, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
#:<s>--[[User:Boothy443|Boothy443]] | [[User talk:Boothy443|comhrÚ]] 07:03, 25 August 2005 (UTC)</s>
#'''Oppose''' per Astrotrain. [[User:Freestylefrappe|freestylefrappe]] 04:56, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', lack of experience, barring answer to question below. [[User:Variable|siafu]] 17:38, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
#'''Strong Oppose''' – The user has not specified an email ID as of this post. If he blocks someone, how is that person going to contact him? [[User:Nichalp|<span style="color:#0082B8;">=Nichalp</span>]] [[User talk:Nichalp|<span style="color:#0082B8;">«Talk»=</span>]] 19:25, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' An Administrator must not be deterred by vandals, no matter how many. [[User:Derktar|Derktar]] 15:31, August 29, 2005 (UTC).
'''Neutral'''
Line 34 ⟶ 38:
* '''Question:''' Could you describe what you would take into account when closing a VfD? [[User:Hipocrite|Hipocrite]] 13:37, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
*'''Question''' I would like to know, what percentage specifically (within 5%) would you consider to be consensus when closing a VfD or related function? [[User:Hamster Sandwich|Hamster Sandwich]] 20:48, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Has he left? He blanked his user page and talk page and his last contribution was 2 days ago. Seems odd that he would leave during his RFA. [[User:Jobe6|<
*:'''Comment''' see the end of [[Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Anyone_else_getting_tired_of_this.3F]]. It was vandalized by an anon and then he didn't restore it all the way (or the anon could have been him...) <small>[[User:RN|Ryan Norton]] <sup
'''Questions for the candidate'''<br />
Line 47 ⟶ 51:
:'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
::'''A'''. Most of the conflict I have came across is from vandals and spammers. To avoid conflict I read talk pages and histories of articles I plan to edit. I have had very few complaints about my editing so far. I have a large watchlist of over 2000 articles which I check for any problems.
== Comments regarding the closure of this nomination ==
Boothy443's vote is removed because (a) Boothy443 is believed to be a sockpuppet of a banned user, and (b) Boothy443 has a pattern of making unhelpful votes at RFA.
70.5% of votes are in support, falling short of the usual ratio for promotion of 75-80%.
There are some unanswered questions from late in the comment period. While in other circumstances it might be wise to extend the duration of the vote to permit NSK to respond to them, he appears to have left the project for a time. Therefore, I have closed this RFA without promotion. [[User:UninvitedCompany|The Uninvited]] Co., [[User_talk:UninvitedCompany|Inc.]] 16:44, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
[[Category:Unsuccessful requests for adminship|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
|