Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Calsicol: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 18:
Calsicol messed up when he replied to a comment on Merchbow's talk page, and we see Merchbow amend his signature here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Merchbow&diff=next&oldid=86724616]. A number of double votes at [[Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 November 4]] have subsequently been stricken out. Both accounts have been around for some time (June 2005 for Calsicol and Jan 2006 for Merchbow) but both have a large amount of edits categorising articles. Neither has edited since the sock puppet tag was added their user pages based on the talk page diff. [[User:Tim!|Tim!]] 19:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
{{Declined}} Sounds to me like this one is pretty clear, and barring some issue rising from the unspecified deletion discussions, I don't really see where a checkuser is necessary. If there are special circumstances that require checkuser, please cite them, but barring that, I don't see any reason to go to the trouble of checking a pretty obvious case. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Essjay|<
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
|