Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Calsicol: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Calsicol: close |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4:
-->
{| class="messagebox"
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Pending&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Requests for checkuser]] (but will still appear here).
|}
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <
=== Calsicol ===
Line 18:
Calsicol messed up when he replied to a comment on Merchbow's talk page, and we see Merchbow amend his signature here [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Merchbow&diff=next&oldid=86724616]. A number of double votes at [[Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 November 4]] have subsequently been stricken out. Both accounts have been around for some time (June 2005 for Calsicol and Jan 2006 for Merchbow) but both have a large amount of edits categorising articles. Neither has edited since the sock puppet tag was added their user pages based on the talk page diff. [[User:Tim!|Tim!]] 19:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
{{Declined}} Sounds to me like this one is pretty clear, and barring some issue rising from the unspecified deletion discussions, I don't really see where a checkuser is necessary. If there are special circumstances that require checkuser, please cite them, but barring that, I don't see any reason to go to the trouble of checking a pretty obvious case. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Essjay|<
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <
</br>
</noinclude>
|