Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Forge CodeProfiler: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was delete |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 21:
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style='font:1em"Avenir";background:#CCF;padding:2px 4px'>[[User:Czar|<
<hr style="width:55%;" />
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style='font:1em"Avenir";background:#CCF;padding:2px 4px'>[[User:Czar|<
<hr style="width:55%;" />
* '''Delete''' I could not find ant non-trivial mentions other than a single short mention as an example, without further discussion, in http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-35302-4_6. The article being written like an advertisement by an editor with a conflict-of-interest doesn't help either. —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 09:23, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
* '''Clarify''' What about the report written by Analysts KuppingerCole? It's focussed on CodeProfiler. [[User:Vfeditor|Vfeditor]] ([[User talk:Vfeditor|talk]]) 12:25, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
** These kinds of reports are often written at the request of (and paid for by) the vendor, so it wouldn't pass the "independent" part of the "non-trivial mentions in multiple independent reliable sources". —''[[User:Ruud Koot|Ruud]]'' 14:02, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|