Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Useful unix command (second nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
**A5 only lets us speedy articles that have been afd'd with a result to transwiki. Despite every comment being to delete or transwiki, it was closed as no consensus. ~~~~ |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result of the debate was '''to delete the article.''' --[[User:Canderson7|Canderson]]'''[[User_talk:Canderson7|7]]''' 14:31, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
===[[Useful unix command]]===
Now that this has been transwikied, it should be deleted, [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Useful unix command|''just like everyone agreed to do last time'']]. Thanks for the needless bureaucracy. —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] [[User talk:Cryptic|(talk)]] 15:47, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete'''. This is not an article. I see no reason at all to drag it through a slow AfD process. [[User:Friday|Friday]] [[User_talk:Friday|(talk)]] 16:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
* '''speedy delete''', of course. What bureaucracy forces us to list this again? I thought CSD A5 allows us to speedy articles that have been AfD'd and then successfully transwiki'd. — [[User:Brighterorange|<
**A5 only lets us speedy articles that have been afd'd with a result to transwiki. Despite every comment being to delete or transwiki, it was closed as no consensus. —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] [[User talk:Cryptic|(talk)]] 18:32, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete'''. [[User:Gazpacho|Gazpacho]] 18:02, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''rm''' (UNIX for "delete"). Not useful article. [[User:Barno|Barno]] 20:53, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete'''. [[User:Andrew pmk|Andrew pmk]] | [[User_talk:Andrew pmk|Talk]] 23:56, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete.''' CSD-criteria should be interpreted far more liberally. / [[User:Karmosin|Peter]] <sup>[[User talk:Karmosin|Isotalo]]</sup> 01:07, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. <s>Censure nominator for bad faith renomination of an article properly closed just two days ago with no consensus, and for falsely claiming that the previous result was unanimous for transwiki.</s> See apology below. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]][[User talk:Tony Sidaway|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 01:13, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
**Did you look at the ''comments'' in the previous vfd, 100% of which clearly favored either a deletion or a transwiki as I stated, or just count which words they bolded? —[[User:Cryptic|Cryptic]] [[User talk:Cryptic|(talk)]] 09:06, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
**Firstly I think I was far too harsh in assuming bad faith above, and I withdraw that imputation and apologise without reserve. However you said, or appeared to say, that all agreed to transwiki, now you say all favored either deletion or transwiki. Don't you see that deletion and transwiki are completely different operations? --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]][[User talk:Tony Sidaway|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 11:43, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''', and for purposes of ''whether the article exists in Wikipedia'', the answer to Tony's question is "No. Of course not." [[User:Nandesuka|Nandesuka]] 11:52, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div>
| |||