Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakespeare programming language: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:22, 5 October 2006

Latest revision as of 12:41, 11 February 2023

(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

Line 11:

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2006_September_7&diff=prev&oldid=75309566 here]. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I '''abstain'''. [[User:Xoloz|Xoloz]] 04:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

*Is this an AFD I see before me, a language toward the head? Come, let me '''delete''' vote. I vote thee out, and yet I see thee still. Art thou not, whimsical lingo, sensible to deletion as creation? Or art thou an article of the mind? A false creation persisting to the close of discussion? - [[User:Richfife|Richfife]] 04:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

*Ah, but I have to disagree here! Lo, a language that allows writing computer programs as play scripts! What possibilites for the imagination! Come, surely you must '''keep''' this article. [[User:JIP|<fontspan colorstyle="color:#CC0000;">J</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#00CC00;">I</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#0000CC;">P</fontspan>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 08:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

*(Sorry, I don't do Shakespearean language.) <s>'''Delete'''</s> '''Weak keep'''. It is one of the more elaborate esoteric prgramming languages, and a very funny parody of the quasi-english languages of the [[COBOL]] legacy. <s>However, I still do not see the language as notable enough to justify its own page on wikipedia. The one-line description on the [[List of esoteric programming languages]] should be kept, and the contents of the article should probably be copied to the [http://esoteric.voxelperfect.net/wiki/Main_Page Esolang wiki].</s> The Slashdot article establishes (weak) notability. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Tobias Bergemann|Tobias Bergemann]] <s>11:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)</s> 09:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' per Tobias Bergemann. [[User:flowersofnight|flowersofnight]] [[User talk:flowersofnight|(talk)]] 17:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Line 24:

**'''Comment'''. As with the vast majority of AfDs, the point is that an article for a non-notable topic should have never been created as [[Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information|Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information]]. However, I have changed my opinion above from "delete" to "weak keep" as the coverage on Slashdot establishes enough notability in my eyes. &mdash;[[User:Tobias Bergemann|Tobias Bergemann]] 07:59, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>