Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shell for Windows: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Removing Category:Relisted AfD debates |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 12:
Unremarkable computer program. No indication of notability, the one reference listed is simply to a site where it can be downloaded. Fails [[WP:GNG]]. Possible COI as well. Contested PROD, contester claimed: "The software got many awards and well reviews," but I can find no evidence of this. [[User talk:Ravendrop|Ravendrop]] 20:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Rather difficult to search, since the name of the software is such a common phrase (particularly 10 years before this product was introduced), bordering on a generic name. After careful searching through news and web, I don't find any interesting tid bits about this very, very new software package. Fails notability guidelines. [[User:Dennis Brown|Dennis Brown]] ([[User talk:Dennis Brown|talk]]) 22:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The program has good rating and success on two most popular software web-sites<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.softpedia.com/get/Desktop-Enhancements/Shell-Replacements/Shell-for-Windows.shtml|title=Shell for Windows on Softpedia |date= |accessdate=2011-04-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://download.cnet.com/Shell-for-Windows/3000-2072_4-11816232.html#rateit|title=Reviews on Download.com |date= |accessdate=2011-04-16}}</ref>. In spite of young age of program it is not hard to find it on Google<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.google.com/search?q=shell+for+windows|title=Position of Shell for Windows in Google searsh |date= |accessdate=2011-04-16}}</ref>. 02:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 02:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)</small>
Line 23:
* Name of the program should not be considered as grammatic phrase, such as names of many other programs ( [[Games for Windows|Games for Windows]], [[Design II for Windows|Design II for Windows]], [[FaxMail for Windows|FaxMail for Windows]])
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<
*'''Delete''' no reliable 3rd party references to establish notability. As written above, download sites are not reliable references. Artice was created by an [[Wikipedia:Single-purpose account|SPA]], so possible spam. [[User:Dialectric|Dialectric]] ([[User talk:Dialectric|talk]]) 13:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,[[User:Sumsum2010|<
*'''Delete''' - No coverage in reliable sources that I can find, although the name confounds the search. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 17:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||