Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small matter of programming: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 13:
*'''Keep''' - other sources include an entire column in ''Programming Pearls, Second Edition'' - see https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/programming-pearls-second/9780134498058/ch05.html. Just the 2 paragraphs visible without logging in make it clear that SMOP is used ironically --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 05:33, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 06:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)</small>
*'''Comment''' I don't think it is OR. I have heard the phrase several times in my career in the UK and Europe. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black;">[[User:scope_creep|<
::Isn't "I have personally heard this phrase used" the ''essence'' of OR? [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 15:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
:::No. Basing an article on what one has personally heard is OR. Basing an opinion on whether something is well known, in an AfD, when the article itself is appropriately sourced, is what we should be doing, and not something that it is appropriate to complain about. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 01:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
| |||