Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summary of Unicode character assignments: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was delete |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. <strong>[[user:henrik|<
===[[Summary of Unicode character assignments]]===
Line 25:
*'''Delete'''. The current version (Unicode 5.0) was also the first version in the article, so it has never been updated. The tables can only be maintained automated (but there is no bot for this), which cuts me out of improvements. This situation is making the "to be edited for improvements is no deletion argument" unconvincing: here it is. Some column definitions are OR (e.g. Excl/Incl). And: what does the information really add to the encyclopedia? Apart from some legend entries, the page does not give much or easy insight nor oversight of the allocation issues. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 11:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
<small>Notified creator [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MBisanz&diff=prev&oldid=475926799]. -[[User:DePiep|DePiep]] ([[User talk:DePiep|talk]]) 12:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete.''' I defer to the experienced editors' assessment that this is redundant and outdated. Do not redirect; not a likely search term. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Sandstein|<
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ankit Maity|<
<hr style="width:55%;" />
*'''Delete:''' The arguments of the experienced Delete proponents is persuasive. There are in fact ''no'' remaining Keep proponents, and I wonder why this was ever relisted. [[User:Ravenswing|'''<span style="background:Blue;color:Cyan"> Ravenswing </span>''']] 09:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Line 35:
*'''Move without keeping a redirect''' to [[Summary of Unicode 5.0 character assignments]]. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 02:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
::Ok, I just contradicted myself, because that solution deletes the existing title. [[User:Unscintillating|Unscintillating]] ([[User talk:Unscintillating|talk]]) 02:58, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
|