Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparallel processing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →[[Transparallel processing]]: [t. 1] fix font tags linter errors |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''delete'''. [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub>[[User talk:The Bushranger|<span style="color:maroon;">One ping only</span>]]</sub> 10:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
===[[Transparallel processing]]===
:{{la|Transparallel processing}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transparallel processing|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 November 15#{{anchorencode:Transparallel processing}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Transparallel_processing Stats]</span>)
Line 22 ⟶ 29:
: (ad 2) The general definition of COI is clear, but I don't see how it would apply to this particular case. That external link simply refers to anthropological information relevant to the subject. [[User:Gumum|Gumum]] ([[User talk:Gumum|talk]]) 08:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – '''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]''' | [[User_talk:Juliancolton|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray;text-shadow:gray .2em .18em .12em">''Talk''</span></sup>]] 00:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. <span style="border:2px solid #090E0E;padding:0px;">[[User:Musa Raza|<
*'''Delete''' both articles. Van der Helm's transparallel processing article was published in 2004. The ideas have not become notable (that is, written about in depth by people independent of the author) in the succeeding 11 years. Wikipedia is not a place to make things known. Articles here are about concepts that are already well known. [[User:StarryGrandma|StarryGrandma]] ([[User talk:StarryGrandma|talk]]) 06:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:StarryGrandma|StarryGrandma]] ([[User talk:StarryGrandma|talk]]) 06:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' The material has a whiff of crankery: I can't really understand what he is saying at all, then we come to the Example (stacking the pencils) which is mundane in the extreme (I and probably thousands of others have thought of it long ago) and hard to relate to the supposed subject. Lacking obvious notability I do not think this is WP-worthy. [[User:Imaginatorium|Imaginatorium]] ([[User talk:Imaginatorium|talk]]) 15:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
* I see no harm in informing the general WP public about an already feasible form of classical computing with the same computing power as promised by quantum computers (I don't think that [[User:Imaginatorium|Imaginatorium]] or many others have thought of that). However, I acknowledge that this page relies -- too narrowly for WP -- on primary sources. I already decoupled it from other pages, and as far as I am concerned, this page can be deleted. [[User:Gumum|Gumum]] ([[User talk:Gumum|talk]]) 19:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' need more opinions--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 10:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)<br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]]) 10:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*<b>Delete </b> due to lack of notability and sources. I am of the opinion that this does not pass muster. [[User:Tivanir2|Tivanir2]] ([[User talk:Tivanir2|talk]]) 13:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||