Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
m [t. 1] fix font tags linter errors |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 41:
#[[user:Jpgordon]] don't have any clear reasoning put forward to justify his decision: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jpgordon#Review_the_checkuser_case]. Administrator [[user:Aksi_great]], who pushed for this sockpuppetry also don't have any clear evidences:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aksi_great#Blocked_me_for_sockpuppetry_.._why.21.21].
#I didnt get a clear answer from [[User:Thatcher131]] on why he added [[user:Ganeshco]], [[user:Bharatson]] and [[user:Ashokachakra]]. See my question:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thatcher131&diff=prev&oldid=112509797].
Hope to get a legitimate decision on this case -- [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
:{{moreinfo}} — please provide a code letter - it is essential for your Check to be considered, per the instructions at the top of the page. Thank you, <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Anthony_cfc|<span style="color:black;font-weight:bold;">anthony</span>]]<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Anthony_cfc|<span style="color:#ff5b00;font-weight:bold;">cfc</span>]]]</sup></span> 17:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
:{{delisted}} — non-compliant request; refrain from archiving at present, until contact with requesting userh as been responded too. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Anthony_cfc|<span style="color:black;font-weight:bold;">anthony</span>]]<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Anthony_cfc|<span style="color:#ff5b00;font-weight:bold;">cfc</span>]]]</sup></span> 17:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
:: I have just added the codes. provided all the evidences needed to fix the check-user. -- [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
{{declined}}. I have no idea what you are asking for here. Self-requested checks are not fulfilled, and these account are all old. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 19:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Line 69:
{{moreinfo}} Per '''E''' (3RR violation using socks), '''please list four differences''' showing the 3RR violation. [[User:Real96|<b style="color:#009900; font-family:georgia;">Real96</b>]] 21:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
:: '''Comment from user''': What [[User:Aksi_great]] argue is incorrect. There might be a lot of people in the same IP ___domain thinking in the same way and posting their comments. The administrator in previous case said ''Likely that Sundaram7 = Bharatson'', but it was just based on his assumption and not confired and proved. Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thatcher131&oldid=113215182] where Thatcher131 is not sure that the others are my sock puppet but he has blocked me already. Thre is a 3RR related to the article [[National Development Front]] which is explained in a different stream[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Lionheart5] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/128.83.114.37]. The 3RR is not from me but related these cases. Fortunately the users were already being blocked based on other requests. [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
: Here are 2 sets of reverts made by the users. If they all are the same person, it would have breached 3RR.
Line 101:
::* '''Also''' pages [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&action=history] for details. He has continous RVVs at[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&oldid=111297602], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&oldid=111275459], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&oldid=111274443] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&oldid=111078763].
::* '''Also''' patterns [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111297602&oldid=111295135], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111275459&oldid=111275175], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111274443&oldid=111273975], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111078763&oldid=111047079], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=110630574&oldid=110537150].
::* Then same can be seen in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marad_massacre&diff=111079038&oldid=111075457] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marad_massacre&action=history]. [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
::I am not a sockpuppet of Hkelkar as has been proved a bazillion times. Such allegations only come from banned [[islamofascist]] trolls, and I have no qualms attacking those that fool themselves into propagating such myths. I have never used sockpuppets in an abusive manner unlike Hkelkar and sundaram/pens withdrawn/bhaisaab/ terryjho/etc.<b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<span style="color:purple;">Baka</span>]][[User talk:Bakasuprman|<span style="color:red;">man</span>]]</b> 04:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Line 108:
:::If any nuetral person analyse the history of that article, they can simply arrive at a conclusion that u are one among the facists. Your edit are simply similar to the edits of those banned users Hkelkar, Lionheart5 and others ips. Only thing is that recently you are very cautious in your efforts to degrade the article, that too after the intervention of admins. <b>Check the very first edit of [[User:Bakasuprman|<span style="color:purple;">Baka</span>]][[User talk:Bakasuprman|<span style="color:red;">man</span>]]</b> in the article ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=96972749&oldid=95995897] -- he gave a new founder to the organization who is one of the accused terrorist and changed "NDF is an Human Rights Organisation" to "NDF is an Terrorist Organisation" and later on it was changed to islamic militant organization. huh!!!!) -- [[User:Fear the Fire|Fear the Fire]] 06:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
:'''Request from user to admin''': To the admin clerk and to whomever resolving this issue, I have a request. Please evaluate both sides and it should not be one sided. [[User:Aksi_great]] has only highlighted the sockpuppery cases of [[user:sundaram7]]. I dont know why he is ignoring the other side. If he not interested to enquire the other side,it proves the '''admin notice board case on [[User:Aksi_great]]''' here:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Reporting_Aksi_great] has some meaning. The parties involved are same. -- [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
::{{clerknote}} Not to say that sort of discussion is irrelevant -- it can be very important -- but that's not the matter at hand on this page, and RfCU isn't a discussion page. Please direct any and all further such discussion to [[WP:AN/I]] or to this page's talk page. – <span style="font-family: Garamond">[[User:Luna Santin|<
:{{Declined}}. Hurts the eyes. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|∇∆∇∆]]</small></sup> 21:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
|