Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Pens_withdrawn: decline |
m [t. 1] fix font tags linter errors |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>▼
<!-- ▼
If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.▼
-->▼
{| class="messagebox"▼
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Pending&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Requests for checkuser]] (but will still appear here).▼
|}▼
<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">▼
<div style="text-align:center;">''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <
<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->▼
=== Pens_withdrawn ===
{{rfcu box|case=Pens withdrawn|filed=05:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)}}
Line 29 ⟶ 41:
#[[user:Jpgordon]] don't have any clear reasoning put forward to justify his decision: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jpgordon#Review_the_checkuser_case]. Administrator [[user:Aksi_great]], who pushed for this sockpuppetry also don't have any clear evidences:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aksi_great#Blocked_me_for_sockpuppetry_.._why.21.21].
#I didnt get a clear answer from [[User:Thatcher131]] on why he added [[user:Ganeshco]], [[user:Bharatson]] and [[user:Ashokachakra]]. See my question:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thatcher131&diff=prev&oldid=112509797].
Hope to get a legitimate decision on this case -- [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
:{{moreinfo}} — please provide a code letter - it is essential for your Check to be considered, per the instructions at the top of the page. Thank you, <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Anthony_cfc|<span style="color:black;font-weight:bold;">anthony</span>]]<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Anthony_cfc|<span style="color:#ff5b00;font-weight:bold;">cfc</span>]]]</sup></span> 17:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
:{{delisted}} — non-compliant request; refrain from archiving at present, until contact with requesting userh as been responded too. <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Anthony_cfc|<span style="color:black;font-weight:bold;">anthony</span>]]<sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:Anthony_cfc|<span style="color:#ff5b00;font-weight:bold;">cfc</span>]]]</sup></span> 17:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
:: I have just added the codes. provided all the evidences needed to fix the check-user. -- [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
{{declined}}. I have no idea what you are asking for here. Self-requested checks are not fulfilled, and these account are all old. [[User:Dmcdevit|Dmcdevit]]·[[User talk:Dmcdevit|t]] 19:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
▲<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>
▲<!--
▲If you are adding a new request for this user please add it above this notice at the top of the page. Only the latest request will appear on the checkuser page. Please don't create a separate page with a different name.
▲-->
▲{| class="messagebox"
▲| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add </br><span style="font-size: 125%">'''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki>'''</span></br> to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Pending&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Requests for checkuser]] (but will still appear here).
▲|}
▲<div style="background: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px;">
▲<center>''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser|Request for checkuser]]. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it'''</font>.</center>
▲<!-- END ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->
=== Sundaram7 ===
Line 63 ⟶ 66:
The first 4 users voted the same way (keep) at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Popular_Front_of_India]]. Bharatson and Ramduke haven't made any edits outside of AfD. The others have also been involved in edit-warring at [[National Development Front]]. I had to fully protect the page today because of the constant edit-warring. See the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&action=history history] of the article to see the many instances where they have reverted to each others' version to evade 3RR. [[User:Aksi_great|Aksi_great]] ([[User_talk:Aksi_great|talk]]) 08:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
: '''Comment''': I was unaware of [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn]] when I filed this case. It has already been proven that Bharatson is a sockpuppet of Sundaram7. But I would still like to know if Truehindu and NotBound are sockpuppets and if yes then who is still continuing sockpuppetry - Sundaram or Fear the Fire. - [[User:Aksi_great|Aksi_great]] ([[User_talk:Aksi_great|talk]]) 19:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
:::{{clerknote}}: Moved to [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pens withdrawn]]. [[User:Real96|<b
{{moreinfo}} Per '''E''' (3RR violation using socks), '''please list four differences''' showing the 3RR violation. [[User:Real96|<b
:: '''Comment from user''': What [[User:Aksi_great]] argue is incorrect. There might be a lot of people in the same IP ___domain thinking in the same way and posting their comments. The administrator in previous case said ''Likely that Sundaram7 = Bharatson'', but it was just based on his assumption and not confired and proved. Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thatcher131&oldid=113215182] where Thatcher131 is not sure that the others are my sock puppet but he has blocked me already. Thre is a 3RR related to the article [[National Development Front]] which is explained in a different stream[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Lionheart5] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/128.83.114.37]. The 3RR is not from me but related these cases. Fortunately the users were already being blocked based on other requests. [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
: Here are 2 sets of reverts made by the users. If they all are the same person, it would have breached 3RR.
Line 98 ⟶ 101:
::* '''Also''' pages [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&action=history] for details. He has continous RVVs at[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&oldid=111297602], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&oldid=111275459], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&oldid=111274443] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&oldid=111078763].
::* '''Also''' patterns [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111297602&oldid=111295135], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111275459&oldid=111275175], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111274443&oldid=111273975], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=111078763&oldid=111047079], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=110630574&oldid=110537150].
::* Then same can be seen in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marad_massacre&diff=111079038&oldid=111075457] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marad_massacre&action=history]. [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
::I am not a sockpuppet of Hkelkar as has been proved a bazillion times. Such allegations only come from banned [[islamofascist]] trolls, and I have no qualms attacking those that fool themselves into propagating such myths. I have never used sockpuppets in an abusive manner unlike Hkelkar and sundaram/pens withdrawn/bhaisaab/ terryjho/etc.<b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<
::: Can u mention, where i used a suckpuppet in abusive manner??.. if u are talking about [[User:Wrong_not]], what did that user do?? he had contributed only once in wiki [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Development_Front&diff=110315605&oldid=110315276] which was a revert for the changes made by a vandal ip. If i am the same user, I could have easily reverted myself without any edit warning... I dont understand why u keep so much hatred towards muslims???
:::If any nuetral person analyse the history of that article, they can simply arrive at a conclusion that u are one among the facists. Your edit are simply similar to the edits of those banned users Hkelkar, Lionheart5 and others ips. Only thing is that recently you are very cautious in your efforts to degrade the article, that too after the intervention of admins. <b>Check the very first edit of [[User:Bakasuprman|<
:'''Request from user to admin''': To the admin clerk and to whomever resolving this issue, I have a request. Please evaluate both sides and it should not be one sided. [[User:Aksi_great]] has only highlighted the sockpuppery cases of [[user:sundaram7]]. I dont know why he is ignoring the other side. If he not interested to enquire the other side,it proves the '''admin notice board case on [[User:Aksi_great]]''' here:[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Reporting_Aksi_great] has some meaning. The parties involved are same. -- [[User:Sundaram7|<b><
::{{clerknote}} Not to say that sort of discussion is irrelevant -- it can be very important -- but that's not the matter at hand on this page, and RfCU isn't a discussion page. Please direct any and all further such discussion to [[WP:AN/I]] or to this page's talk page. – <span style="font-family: Garamond">[[User:Luna Santin|<
:{{Declined}}. Hurts the eyes. --[[User:Jpgordon|jpgordon]]<sup><small>[[User talk:Jpgordon|∇∆∇∆]]</small></sup> 21:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Line 141 ⟶ 144:
{{userlinks|BhaiSaab}} and {{userlinks|TerryJ-Ho}} are banned for one year per [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar]], and have already been caught using sockpuppets at [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/MinaretDk]]. Pens withdrawn and Wrong_not are two new accounts that have been edit warring with an anonymous IP editor from the University of Texas at Austin (obviously Hkelkar) at {{la|National Development Front}}. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 12:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
:There is a better chance pens is related to the users I listed. They have engaged in votestacking [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Popular_Front_of_India&action=history here].<b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<
*{{confirmed}} that [[User:Wrong_not|Wrong_not]] = [[User:Pens_withdrawn|Pens_withdrawn]], but {{unrelated}} to TerryJ-Ho, His excellency, or BhaiSaab.
Line 148 ⟶ 151:
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <
</br>
</noinclude>
| |||