Talk:Caltrain Modernization Program/GA1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 04:18, 15 September 2017 edit Haha169 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,522 edits m formatting fix ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 12:13, 26 February 2023 edit undo Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk \| contribs) Bots, Mass message senders 4,087,861 edits m Qwerfjkl (bot) moved page Talk:Electrification of Caltrain/GA1 to Talk:Caltrain Modernization Program/GA1: Move GA subpage to match talk page Tag: PAWS [2.1]
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 114: #It is '''reasonably well written'''. #:a ''(prose)'': {{GAList/check\|~~hold~~yes}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style\|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD\|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT\|layout]], [[WP:WTW\|word choice]], [[WP:WAF\|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list\|lists]])'': {{GAList/check\|~~hold~~yes}} #::See comments above #It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability\|verifiable]]'''. Line 129: #:: #It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images\|images]]''', where possible and appropriate. #:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale\|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check\|yes}} b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP\|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check\|~~hold~~yes}} #::See comments above #:: #'''Overall''': #:''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check\|~~hold~~yes}} #:: <!-- Template:GAList --> Line 139: Thank you for taking the time to thoroughly review this article's conformity to the GA criteria. I will spend the next few days working to solve your concerns and let you know when I am done or have any concerns! --[[User:Haha169\|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169\|talk]]) 02:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC) {{re\|Bob1960evens}}, I believe Mliu and I have taken care of all of your concerns. Thank you again for taking the time to leave a thorough review, and I hope we have fixed all of the issues! --[[User:Haha169\|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169\|talk]]) 23:07, 13 September 2017 (UTC) ***Sorry for the delay in wrapping this up, but I missed the ping somehow. Anyway, I am pleased to see that all of the issues raised have been addressed, and consequently am awarding the article GA status. Well done on an interesting and informative article. Keep up the good work. [[User:Bob1960evens\|Bob1960evens]] ([[User talk:Bob1960evens\|talk]]) 21:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)