Content deleted Content added
m →GA Review: fix |
m Mike Christie moved page Draft:Move/Talk:Free and open-source software/GA1 to Talk:Free and open-source software/GA1 without leaving a redirect: Round-robin history swap step 3 using pageswap |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 5:
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 15:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
;General
*Large chunks of this article have been copied almost word for word from the [[Free Software]] article, in which FOSS seems to be adequately covered already, which puts some doubt in my mind about the existence of this article. It needs to be a lot more than a copy of another one, and I frankly don't see that it is right now.
;Lead
Line 29 ⟶ 32:
;Adoption by governments
*This section is very choppy, with lots of very short paragraphs. It needs to be organised thematically; for instance, which governments have adopted Linux (of whatever flavour), other open-source software like OpenOffice, or perhaps categorise by office applications vs non, such as Apache and MySql, neither of which are mentioned strangely.
*What are these governments actually adopting? Free software, open source software, or FOSS? In what way would a FOSS licence (is there such a thing?) differ from either of the other two types of licence? Is this section actually relevant to FOSS at all, rather than to the open source and free software articles?
;References
*There are five dead links.[http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=Free_and_open_source_software]
Closing review as per nominator's request.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFleetCommand&action=historysubmit&diff=431051692&oldid=430990894]
{{discussion bottom}}
| |||