Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probability control: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:21, 18 February 2007

Latest revision as of 07:36, 1 March 2023

(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. - '''[[User:Daniel.Bryant|<span style="color:#2E82F4">Daniel.Bryant</span>]]''' 08:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

===[[Probability control]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}

:{{la|Probability control}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Probability control|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 February 18#{{anchorencode:Probability control}}|View log]])</noinclude>

I put a PROD tag on this article, but someone removed it, so here I am. As it stands, this article is errant nonsense, suggesting that a machine might be constructed to navigate among alternate universes (many-worlds interpretation of QM). [[User:DavidCBryant|DavidCBryant]] 15:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Line 6 ⟶ 13:

:In my opinion, none of the legitimate uses of the phrase "probability control" are notable enough to merit an article on Wikipedia, and the best thing to do is to put this article out of its misery. [[User:DavidCBryant|DavidCBryant]] 15:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''delete''' or '''merge''' with [[quantum immortality]]. [[User:Smmurphy|Smmurphy]]^{([[User talk:Smmurphy|Talk]])} 02:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete'''. Extraordinary articles require extraordinary proof, but this article has no references. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] ([[User talk:Jitse Niesen|talk]]) 08:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''delete''' not only no references, but no content except the one sentence statement. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' 11:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''delete''' This may be a logical consequence of [[quantum immortality]], which is SF (by Bruce Sterling, IIRC); but that belongs in that article, '''if''' anywhere. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 15:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' per ''all of the above''. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:x-large;">[[User:(jarbarf)|(jarbarf)]]</span> 00:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>