Content deleted Content added
Magioladitis (talk | contribs) m Magioladitis moved page Talk:.NET Framework/Archive3 to Talk:.NET Framework/Archive 3: name standardisation to enable auto-detection |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 179:
[[User:72.242.6.114|72.242.6.114]] 14:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
:While it is possible to execute .NET code on non-Windows platforms, through mono or silverlight, the limitations of these solutions still make multi-platform .NET development difficult and often impractical. I think the article should reflect that.[[User:Nimrand|Nimrand]] 03:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
::I agree with you on Silverlight (infact the current silverlight 1.1 for everything has nothing to do with .NET yet). However, Mono is not as limited as you seem to think. Making anything work on Mono that works on .NET takes very little work if any most of the time unless you are doing something platform specific to windows (like COM interop). The 3.5 features are little behind but it's almost head and head with .NET 2.0 (and some of the features in 3.0). -'''<
:::Silverlight isn't meant for cross-platform ''.net development''. While it does include the (almost) same runtime and gc, the class library is too bare-bones to be called a .net port. If you are interested in writing cross-platform .net apps, write them on mono. Since it is a subset of .net fx, it will work on both .net fx and mono. --[[User:Soumyasch|soum]] <sup>[[User talk:Soumyasch|talk]]</sup> 06:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
| |||