Template:Self-sourcing examples/doc: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:43, 23 June 2016

Latest revision as of 12:07, 5 March 2023

(46 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)

Line 2:

{{Tsh|Refex}}

'''Example template usage for copy-pasting''':

=={{anchor|Self-sourcing example}}{{anchor|self sourcing example}}{{anchor|self sourcing examples}}{{anchor|self-sourcing}}{{anchor|self sourcing}}{{anchor|Self-sourcing}}{{anchor|Self sourcing}}Self-sourcing examples==

A [[Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability/Archive_63#RfC:_Are_.22in_popular_culture.22_entries_.22self-sourcing.22_or_do_they_require_a_reference_under_Wikipedia:Verifiability_and_Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources.3F|self-sourcing example]], according to current consensus by discussion on [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability|WT:V]], is an examples that is cited to [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources|primary sources]], or an example with citations that only establish the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] of the example. An example in an article should have sources that not only establish its verifiability, but also its significance in the context of the article.

:{{tlc|RefexampleSelf-sourcing examples|section|2=date{{=}}{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

{{tlc|Self-sourcing examples|section|small{{=}}y|date{{=}}{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

{{tlc|Self-sourcing examples|date{{=}}{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

{{tlc|Self-sourcing examples|date{{=}}{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}|talk{{=}}{{var|Talk page section}}}}

__TOC__

=={{anchor|Self-sourcing example}}{{anchor|self sourcing example}}{{anchor|self sourcing examples}}{{anchor|self-sourcing}}{{anchor|self sourcing}}{{anchor|Self-sourcing}}{{anchor|Self sourcing}}Self-sourcing examples==

==Self-sourcing examples==

===Examples should be ''meaningful'' in the context of the article, explained in the prose and cited to reliable sources===

A [[Wikipedia_talkWikipedia talk:Verifiability/Archive_63Archive 63#RfC:_Are_ Are .22in_popular_culture22in popular culture.22_entries_22 entries .22self-sourcing.22_or_do_they_require_a_reference_under_Wikipedia22 or do they require a reference under Wikipedia:Verifiability_and_WikipediaVerifiability and Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sourcesIdentifying reliable sources.3F|self-sourcing example]] in popular culture, according to current consensus by discussion on [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability|WT:V]], is an examplesexample that is cited to [[Wikipedia:No_original_researchNo original research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources2C secondary and tertiary sources|primary sources]], or an example with citations that only establish the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] of the example. An example in anpopular articleculture should have sources that not only establish its verifiability, but also discuss its significance in the context of the article.

===Examples of self-sourcing examples===

Line 11 ⟶ 25:

<!-- Fake reference -->

::'''References'''

:{{anchor|Fakeref1}}1. {{cite AV media|title=[[Pinocchio (1940 film)|Pinocchio]]|author=[[Walt Disney]]|author-link=Walt Disney|date=1940}}

:{{anchor|Fakeref2}}2. {{cite news |last=Nugent |first=Frank S. |url=httphttps://www.nytimes.com/movie/review?_r=1&res=9A03E2D8113EE33ABC4053DFB466838B659EDE&oref=slogin |title=Pinocchio - The Screen in Review|newspaper=The New York Times |date=February 8, 1940}}

}}

The provided sources establish the [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiability]] of the example. They might even establish its [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]]. However, they do not discuss the example in the context it's given in the article. Such an example may be challenged or removed.

A source that discusses''does'' discuss the significance of an example in the context of the article might look like the following:

{{divbox|1=white|3=

[[Jiminy Cricket]] is an example of [[arthropods in film]].^{[[#Fakeref3|[1]]]}

<!-- Fake reference -->

::'''References'''

:{{anchor|Fakeref3}}1.{{citecitation|title=Encyclopedia of Insects|chapter=Insects in Movies|author1=Vincent H. Resh|author2=Ring T. Cardé|publisher=Academic Press|date=2009||isbn=9780080920900|pp=[http://what-when-how.com/insects/movies-insects-in-insects/ 668&mdash;674668–674]|quote={{small|Arguably the most well-known animated arthropod was Jiminy Cricket, who initially appeared in a supporting role in the 1940 Walt Disney feature Pinocchio. Disney animators used a talking cricket, a minor character that appeared in the original Pinocchio story by Carlo Collodi, to unify disparate elements within the film. The character proved to be popular as a “voice of conscience” and appeared in several series of subsequent short subjects and educational films. Jiminy exemplifies the liberties taken with insect morphology by animators; although early sketches depicted the character with more insect-like features, the final film version, with its two arms and two legs, eyes with pupils, and morning coat and vest, resembles a dapper elf more than any arthropod.}} }}

}}

The source discusses the example, in the context of the article, at relative depth, while explaining the example's significance in that context.

A source that discusses an example as significant in one context does not necessarily show its significantsignificance in another context:

{{divbox|1=white|3=

[[Jiminy Cricket]] is an example of [[insects in literature]].^{[[#Fakeref4|[1]]]}{{better source example}}

<!-- Fake reference -->

::'''References'''

:{{anchor|Fakeref4}}1.{{citecitation|title=Encyclopedia of Insects|chapter=Insects in Movies|author1=Vincent H. Resh|author2=Ring T. Cardé|publisher=Academic Press|date=2009||isbn=9780080920900|pp=668&mdash;674668–674}}

}}

The source discusses the example ''in a different context'' than the one provided.

Some examples may be of [[Template:importance example|questionable importance]].

{{divbox|1=white|3=[[Jiminy Cricket]] is an example of [[insects in literature]].{{citation needed}}{{importance example}} }}

==Usage==

===When to use===

This [[Wikipedia:Templates|template]] indicates that the article or section needs additional inline citations that do not fall under [[Wikipedia_talkWikipedia talk:Verifiability/Archive_63Archive 63#RfC:_Are_ Are .22in_popular_culture22in popular culture.22_entries_22 entries .22self-sourcing.22_or_do_they_require_a_reference_under_Wikipedia22 or do they require a reference under Wikipedia:Verifiability_and_WikipediaVerifiability and Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sourcesIdentifying reliable sources.3F|self-sourcing examples]]. This template should be used only for articles where there are some, but insufficient, inline citations to support the material currently in the article.

===Inline alternatives===

Please consider marking individual poorly-referenced statements with {{tltlx|Better source needed example}} or {{tlx|importance example}} instead of placing this template.

===How to use===

According to [[MOS:LAYOUT]], maintenance templates such as this one ought be placed after hatnotes, at the start of the article. That placement is supported by consensus obtained in an RfC at {{section link|Template talk:RefimproveMore citations needed|RfC: Location of Tag}}.

Listed below are four examples of usage:

AThe optional {{para|talk}} parameter is allowed; setting this to any non-empty value will result in the message "See talk page for details." being included in the tag. If the value is a valid anchor on the talk page (''e.g.'', the title of a section or subsection heading), then the talk page link will go directly to that anchor; if not, to the top of the page.

:{{tlc|Refexample}}

:{{tlc|Refexample|2=date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

:{{tlc|Refexample|section}}&nbsp; (the same as {{Tlx|Refexample section}})

::This can be made smaller with {{tlc|Refexample|section|small{{=}}y}} or {{tlc|Refexample section|small{{=}}y}}

:{{tlc|Refexample|section|<nowiki>{{subst:DATE}}</nowiki>|talk{{=}}{{var|Talk page section name}}|small{{=}}y}}

The optional {{para|small}} parameter is allowed; setting this to any non-empty value will result in a smaller, left-aligned message box.

The optional {{para|date}} parameter is allowed; it requires using a non-abbreviated month name and four-digit year. Adding this parameter sorts the article into subcategories of [[:Category:Articles needing additional references]] and out of the parent category, allowing the oldest problems to be identified and dealt with first. A [[Wikipedia:Bot policy|bot]] will add this parameter if it is omitted. This parameter adds the article to [[:Category:Articles needing additional references from {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}]], and [[:Category:All articles needing additional references]], both [[:Category:Hidden categories|hidden categories]]. The simplest way to use this parameter manually is to copy the following example:

According to [[MOS:LAYOUT]], maintenance templates such as this one ought be placed after hatnotes, at the start of the article. That placement is supported by consensus obtained in an RfC at {{section link|Template talk:Refimprove|RfC: Location of Tag}}.

{{Tlc|Self-sourcing examples|date{{=}}{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

A {{para|talk}} parameter is allowed; setting this to any value will result in the message "See talk page for details." being included in the tag. If the value is a valid anchor on the talk page (''e.g.'', the title of a section or subsection heading), then the talk page link will go directly to that anchor; if not, to the top of the page.

This template also includes support for using the {{para|date}} parameter. Adding this parameter sorts the article into subcategories of [[:Category:Articles needing additional references]] and out of the parent category, allowing the oldest problems to be identified and dealt with first. A [[Wikipedia:Bot policy|bot]] will add this parameter if it is omitted. Be careful '''''not''''' to abbreviate the date, because then it will automatically add a redlinked category instead of the correct category. The simplest way to use this parameter manually is <code><nowiki>{{Refexample|{{subst:DATE}}}}</nowiki></code> but it can be done more explicitly as <code><nowiki>{{Refexample|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> (both result in the same output). Do ''not'' use <code><nowiki>{{Refexample|date={{subst:DATE}}}}</nowiki></code>: <code><nowiki>{{subst:DATE}}</nowiki></code> includes the leading <code>date=</code>.

A user warning template, {{tl|Uw-refexample}}, is available to notify contributors that an article they created needs its referencing improved.

This template adds the article to [[:Category:Articles needing additional references from {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}]], and [[:Category:All articles needing additional references]], both [[:Category:Hidden categories|hidden categories]].

===General advantage===

* The naming scheme of Refimprove parallels that used for {{tl|Refbegin}}, {{tl|Refend}}, and {{tl|Reflist}}, thereby reducing confusion, in compliance with the [[KISS principle]].

==Differences from related templates==

==={{Tl|Primary sources}}===

* If an article has sufficient inline citations, but if the citations in an article are from primary sources (see [[WP:USEPRIMARY]]), then use ''{{tl|Primary sources}}''.

==={{Tl|Third-party sources}}===

* If an article has sufficient inline citations, but if the citations in an article are from sources affiliated with the subject (see [[WP:INDY]]), then use ''{{tl|Third-party}}''.

==Template data==

{{TemplateData header}}

{{TemplateDataHeader}}

<templatedata>

{

Line 97:

"type": "string",

"required": false

},

"small": {

},

"label": "small",

"description": "Any value (such as 'y') will result in a smaller message box",

"type": "string",

"required": false

} },

"format": "block"

}

Line 104 ⟶ 109:

==See also==

* [[WP:INDISCRIMINATE]]

* [[Wikipedia_talkWikipedia talk:Verifiability/Archive_63Archive 63#RfC:_Are_ Are .22in_popular_culture22in popular culture.22_entries_22 entries .22self-sourcing.22_or_do_they_require_a_reference_under_Wikipedia22 or do they require a reference under Wikipedia:Verifiability_and_WikipediaVerifiability and Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sourcesIdentifying reliable sources.3F|Discussion and consensus about the verifiability of examples]]

* {{Tl|Refimprove}}

* [[:Template:Citation needed/doc#Inline templates]]

** {{Tl|Importance example}} — an inline variation of this template

** {{Tl|Better source}}

** {{Tl|Refimprove inline}}

* {{Tl|RefimproveExample farm}}

* [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup/Verifiability and sources]]

{{Citation and verifiability article maintenance templates}}

<includeonly>{{sandbox other||

<!-- Add Categories below this line, please; interwikis at Wikidata -->

[[Category:Citation and verifiability maintenance templates]]

}}</includeonly>

[[Category:Inline cleanup templates]]

[[Category:Exclude in print]]

<!-- Add interlangs below this line -->

</includeonly>