Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot I (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Talk:Fibonacci number. |
Sennecaster (talk | contribs) m Sennecaster moved page Talk:Fibonacci number/Archive 2 to Talk:Fibonacci sequence/Archive 2 without leaving a redirect: Requested at WP:RMTR by User:ModernDayTrilobite: Per recent RM closure at Talk:Fibonacci_number#Requested_move_1_March_2023. |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 104:
== Fibonacci sequence ==
This article should be called ''Fibonacci sequence'' and not ''Fibonacci number''. A ''Fibonacci number'' is meaningless out of the context of its sequence. If I asked you "what is 21?", nobody would say "the Fibonacci number after 13". But if I asked "what is 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21...?, I'd have a much greater chance of hearing "Fibonacci sequence". This article should be moved to ''Fibonacci sequence'' over the redirect, and ''Fibonacci number'' should redirect to ''Fibonacci sequence''. <
:: I was going to say it's commonly called "numbers" by everyone in the world, but then I looked at the interwiki links: bg, cs, eo, pt, ru - Numbers. ca, de, el, es, fr, it, scn, sk, tr, uk - Sequence. Still, I've mostly seen it as "numbers" in English - for example that's how it's called on the Integer Sequences site [http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A000045] and, for another example, Wolfram's Mathworld defines the Sequence [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FibonacciSequence.html] as "see Fibonacci Number". The Marriam-Webster dictionary of the English Language has the entry for numbers [http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/Fibonacci%20number] but not sequence, while American Heritage Dictionary has both and essentially says "See Sequence" for Number: [http://www.bartleby.com/61/0/F0100000.html] and [http://www.bartleby.com/61/1/F0100100.html]. Doesn't look like there is an agreement. --[[User:Cubbi|Cubbi]] ([[User talk:Cubbi|talk]]) 12:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
:Though I'm not sure it's supported by Cubbi's post, isn't "sequence" a alightly technical mathematician's way of putting it, and "numbers" what the man in the street would say? Fibonacci numbers are rather insignificant in professional math, but play a quite significant role in popular math, recreational math. I'm for keeping the article at "numbers".--[[User:Noe|Niels Ø (noe)]] ([[User talk:Noe|talk]]) 13:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Line 391:
This is an example of how to print a Fibonacci series in [[C (programming language)|C]]:
<
#include<stdio.h>
#include<conio.h>
Line 415:
return fib(n-1)+fib(n-2);
}
</syntaxhighlight>
== MathWorld Fibonacci article should be linked ==
Line 852:
::Your function seems to get me to -18.1040617 + 24.5918696 i instead of i for some reason. [[User:Robo37|Robo37]] ([[User talk:Robo37|talk]]) 11:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
== Example of Implementation in Programming ==
Seeing as calculation of the Fibonacci Number is a fundamental problem in recursive computer programming, I would find it only appropriate that this page contain at least one example implementation. I feel that many people looking into the Fibonacci Sequence may have some computer background and a quick topic containing some basic code to calculate it, ideally in a functional programming language, would be of great use to them. I would be more than happy to write this up and add it, but as somewhat of a newcomer to the contribution side of Wikipedia I felt it appropriate that I gauge people's feelings on this matter first. Thoughts? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Swat510|Swat510]] ([[User talk:Swat510|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Swat510|contribs]]) 07:00, 6 August 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
{{wikibooks|Fibonacci number program}}
:Thanks for coming here first. [[Fibonacci number#External links]] has the box to the right with a link to a page which was originally a Wikipedia article at [[Fibonacci number program]], but it was transwikied to Wikibooks at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibonacci number program (2 nomination)]]. There are still several examples at [[Recursion (computer science)#Fibonacci]] where it seems more appropriate for the purpose you mention. I have added a link to [[Fibonacci number#See also]]. This seems sufficient for this article which is not suppsed to be about programming. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 14:02, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
::Ah, nifty. Didn't see that before. I agree the Recursion topic makes more sense.
| |||