Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Images to improve/Archive/Feb 2007: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Replacing Image:DNA_orbit_animated_small.gif with Image:DNA_orbit_animated.gif (by Rlevse because: Was in category "Duplicate", although NOT an exact duplicate). |
m Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <font> (22x), <center> (11x) Tag: Fixed lint errors |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2:
== La Salle Academy Logo ==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg|Original
</gallery></
'''Article(s):'''
Line 20:
=={{did}} Flight paths ==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:FlightPaths.jpg
Image:Greatcircle_Jetstream_routes.svg
</gallery></
'''Article(s):''' [[Jet stream]] and [[Great circle]]
Line 36:
== {{did}}Caisson Schematic ==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:Caisson Schematic.svg|Original JPG
Image:Caisson Schematic.svg|English SVG version
Image:Caisson Schematic numbered.svg|Numbered version
</gallery></
'''Article(s):''' [[Caisson (engineering)]]
'''Request:''' A request from [[:Category:Images which should be in SVG format]]. I'm trying to find the best candidates and bringing them to your attention.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<
'''Graphist opinion:''' I'll try this one; it looks simple enough -[[User:YK Times|YK Times]] 19:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
:Done. Should I add anything (like a numbered version for commons, different colours, or finishing touches)? -[[User:YK Times|YK Times]] 02:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
::Yes, I think a numbered version would be great, the article exists on seven other language wikis. Also, I think the English one should be on Commons as well.↔[[User:Nmajdan|<
:::Okay, I did a numbered version, and uploaded both to Commons. -[[User:YK Times|YK Times]] 01:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
::::Looks great!↔[[User:Nmajdan|<
== {{did}}Reflux ==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:Reflux.png|Original
Image:Reflux.svg|SVG conversion
Image:Reflux English.svg|English labels
</gallery></
'''Article(s):''' [[Reflux]]
'''Request:''' Another image from [[:Category:Images which should be in SVG format]].↔[[User:Nmajdan|<
'''Graphist opinion:'''
Line 75:
=={{did}} Stirling Engine ==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:Stirling_Animation.gif|Original
Image:Stirling Animation.gif|version by [[User:YK Times|YK Times]]
Image:Stirling_Animation.gif| half size version
</gallery></
'''Article(s):''' [[Stirling Engine]]
Line 109:
=={{did}} Olmec figurine==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:OlmecFigurine2.jpg
Image:Olmec Figurine.jpg
</gallery></
'''Article(s):'''[[Olmec figurine]] and perhaps others if the image were better
Line 124:
:It does help! Thanks loads for improving [[:Image:OlmecFigurine2.jpg]]. It's a definite improvement! [[User:Madman2001|Madman]] 15:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63296594932" ></span>
== Translation from french of a diagram ==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:Schema nucleaire.JPG|Original
Image:Nuclear Fuel Process.en.svg|English captions
Image:Nuclear Fuel Process.fr.svg|French captions
Image:Nuclear Fuel Process.num.svg|Numeric captions
</gallery></
'''Request:''' Here is a diagram that could be translated into english. --[[User:Enr-v|Enr-v]] 15:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Line 167:
::I like the newer diagram better myself. It's much more obvious as to where to start and is more clean and crisp. Also, you can't make .svg's in Photoshop as far as I know.â[[User:Krasniy|<span style="color: #800">Krasniy</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Krasniy|t]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Krasniy|c]]</sub> 00:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
:new or old diagramm : it's a matter of taste. as far as i'm concerned, i like better the older than the newer. you are right about photoshop, but i can't manage with Inkscape either.--[[User:Enr-v|Enr-v]] 11:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63296862780" ></span>
== Three Mile Island Schematic ==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:Tmi-2 schematic.gif|Original
Image:Image-Tmi-2 schematic.svg|first version, no labels
Image:Tmi-2 schematic.svg|version with labels, deriv of first version
</gallery></
'''Article(s):''' [[Three Mile Island accident]]
'''Request:''' From [[:Category:Images which should be in SVG format]].â[[User:Nmajdan|<
'''Graphist opinion:'''
Line 187:
:::I've labeled the diagram, and substituted {{{vva}}} for {{{SVG}}}. [[User:Stannered|Stannered]] 22:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63296942187" ></span>
== Image:DNA orbit animated small.gif ==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:DNA_orbit_animated.gif|Original
</gallery></
'''Articles:''' Found in the [[DNA]] article.
Line 204:
:: Any further loss of quality is undesireable - its hard to make the structure of DNA clearer with a lower colour depth. At least there's no error in the gif itself, it seems to be a plain file size issue. - '''[[User:Zephyris|Zephyris]]''''' <sub>[[User talk:Zephyris|Talk]]</sub>'' 11:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
<span id="63297152639" ></span>
== Worm anatomy ==
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:Wormanatomy.png
</gallery></
'''Article(s):''' [[Earthworm]]
Line 219:
::: That one is for me. Give me some time. Two related images already exist btw... [[User:Lycaon|Lycaon]] 22:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
<div class="center"><gallery>
Image:Oligochaeta anatomy.svg|Oligochaeta anatomy
Image:Polychaeta anatomy en.svg|Polychaeta anatomy
</gallery></
<span id="63297668759" ></span>
== Chemical structures ==
''for images, please see the [[Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve/Chemical structures|sub-page]]''
Line 230:
'''Article(s):''' Various
'''Request:''' Don't hate me. Above are many simple chemical structures that would be nice to have as an SVG. They are from [[:Category:Images which should be in SVG format]]. There are more in that category and [[:Category:Chemical structures]]. This is a start as there are many more where this came from and when these are done, I'll try to make another list.â[[User:Nmajdan|<
'''Graphist opinion:''' I'll start on some of these, but its a big job, so fell free to pitch in if you have the time. Maybe we should move these to a separate page, so it doesn't clog up the request page? -[[User:YK Times|YK Times]] 03:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
::Feel free to move them to a subpage; I'll feel less guilt about adding more. I've tried doing these myself as they are simple enough and I thought they'd be a good training tool. But I tried using Inkscape and got a weird result. I tried the first one above and it looked fine in Inkscape but when I upload it it looks like [http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/3468/snag08bz0.png]. If you have any suggestions, please leave them on my talk page.â[[User:Nmajdan|<
:::Okay, I moved them to a [[Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Images to improve/Chemical structures|subpage]], so that it clears up this request page a bit, and so that it doesn't take so long to load. -[[User:YK Times|YK Times]] 17:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
:: It seems as though we should create some sort of library of shapes so that we can keep these consistent. [[User:ChaosNil|ChaosNil]] 05:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Line 240:
::::Not sure about policy, but a good analogy to look at is your browser: it accesses pages but does not do any actual editing. I imagine any tool would be fine, so long as the output has an acceptable format and license, without annoying stuff like "This page exported by an academic version of XXX", etc. —[[User:DavidHOzAu|davidh]].[[User talk:DavidHOzAu|oz]].[[Special:Contributions/User:DavidHOzAu|au]] 04:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
:It might be best to coordinate with the editors at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry]] (particularly [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Structure drawing workgroup]]), [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology]]. There have been past discussions about .png vs .svg images for chemical structures, including discussions about which software produces the best results. I would recommend against any automated structure drawing based on SMILES data for anything but the most simple chemical compounds because there are many different ways to represent a single compound, with the best being a chemist's subjective preference. Also, there are literally thousands of chemical images in .png format, so it might be best to start with images on the most popular articles, rather than just the ones tagged for conversion to .svg so far.--[[User:Edgar181|Ed]] ([[User talk:Edgar181|Edgar181]]) 21:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
::That sounds like a plan. Since there is a category for these structures, would anybody be opposed if I removed them all from the Move to Commons category and Convert to SVG category? They alone are creating a substantial backlog in both cats and removing all of them would help tremendously. I know that as these are converted to SVG they will be moved to the Commons so both issues will be resolved.â[[User:Nmajdan|<
| |||
