Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Tznkai: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:33, 13 January 2006

Latest revision as of 16:03, 19 March 2023

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 13:

What are your views of the proposed [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:User_Bill_of_Rights&oldid=33628435 User Bill of Rights]?

--<font colorspan style="color: darkred;"><font facespan style="font-family: georgia;">[[User:Herschelkrustofsky|<span style="color: darkred;">HK</span>]]</fontspan></fontspan> 16:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

:My first response, without even looking, is it sound suspiciously like mainstream politics, and thus should be killed with fire, because Politics is Bad and Wikipolitics is Worse. Glancing through the Code of Conduct it looks like a bunch of suggestions that are easy to follow (when to recuse), a few redundancies (Follow [[WP:NPA]], no really?), and a misunderstanding.

:::" Those elected by the will of the Wikipedia community to serve on the Arbitration Committee are bound by the principles of impartiality and fairness in their decisions."

Line 98:

That answer everything?--[[User:Tznkai|Tznkai]] 00:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

: Of course not, but it shows that you've thought fairly deeply about the issue. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]]|[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 03:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)