Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Mailer diablo: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:45, 13 January 2006

Latest revision as of 16:15, 19 March 2023

(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)

Line 3:

What are your views of the proposed [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:User_Bill_of_Rights&oldid=33628435 User Bill of Rights]?

--<font colorspan style="color: darkred;"><font facespan style="font-family: georgia;">[[User:Herschelkrustofsky|<span style="color: darkred;">HK</span>]]</fontspan></fontspan> 15:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

* Both should be in place ages ago. The former is rather long though, I thought the Recusal section could be easily summarised with ''use common sense''. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 16:12, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Line 34:

#* [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Snowspinner vs. Lir]]. It appears to be rushed; more time should have been spent on its investigation which may impact on final decision. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 13:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

#Can you name one arbitration case which you thought worked spectacularly well? What let that case be so effective? --[[User:Maclean25|maclean<small>25</small>]] 05:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

#* [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Everyking 2]], although the user in question did somehow ended up in another case (over something else), giving him the second chance and the resulting improvement of his conduct on the article in question has led to the eventual discharge of his mentorship. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 13:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

==Concerns over personal attack templates==