Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/RomaC: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:57, 12 January 2006

Latest revision as of 16:17, 19 March 2023

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 9:

What are your views of the proposed [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:User_Bill_of_Rights&oldid=33628435 User Bill of Rights]?

--<font colorspan style="color: darkred;"><font facespan style="font-family: georgia;">[[User:Herschelkrustofsky|<span style="color: darkred;">HK</span>]]</fontspan></fontspan> 16:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks for your question [[User:Herschelkrustofsky|HK]]. I would say that there should be guidelines such as these so that users and arbitrators both know where they stand. In a nutshell, I would say that some Wikipedia processes have become quite complex as the project has evolved, creating a gulf between the 'normal' user and those who know their way round well. This brings about the danger of elitism, to counter that I would support some clearly defined users' rights, along with accountability for arbitrators.

Line 19:

I am inviting all candidates, including Improv, to expand on this theme on their questions pages. Do you agree that this is a cause for concern as we move into 2006? How do you see the role of the arbitration committee in interpreting the interpretation of Wikipedia policy in the light of this concern? --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]]|[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 20:57, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks for your interest [[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] I will respond on your [[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Talk]] page.[[User:RomaC|RomaC]] 16:16, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

:: Thank you. In case I archive the talk page, the diff for your response is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tony_Sidaway&diff=35282601&oldid=35265545 here]. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]]|[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 18:09, 19 January 2006 (UTC)