Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Objectivist theory of value: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:53, 11 March 2008

Latest revision as of 04:01, 4 April 2023

(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 5:

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''no consensus'''. [[User:Citicat|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF0000;">Citi</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#151B8D;">Cat</fontspan></b>]]<small>[[User_talk:Citicat|<fontsup colorstyle="color:#000000;">^{[[User_talk:Citicat| ♫]]}</font>]]</small> 03:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

===[[Objectivist theory of value]]===

Line 70:

<hr style="width:50%;"/>

:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Citicat|<b><fontspan colorstyle="color:#FF0000;">Citi</fontspan><fontspan colorstyle="color:#151B8D;">Cat</fontspan></b>]]<small>[[User_talk:Citicat|<fontsup colorstyle="color:#000000;">^{[[User_talk:Citicat| ♫]]}</font>]]</small> 02:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->

* '''Strong keep''' Detailed, referenced article on key tenet of noteworthy thought from noteworthy thinker. [[User:Joestella|Joestella]] 08:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' and merge useful content elsewhere. The phrase is mention in [http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=133467 this abstract]. I've seen it used only one other time, in Environmental Ethics in the context of "an objectivist theory of value in nature." The topic does not meet [[WP:N]]. The article seems more about ''The philosophic thoughts of [[Ayn Rand]] on objectivist theory of value.'' With Rand predominating the topic, the topic still does not meet [[WP:N]] since the [[WP:RS|source material]] is not indpenendent of rand. Also, we already have enough articles and other material on Ayn Rand: [[Ayn Rand]], [[Ayn Rand Institute]], [[Bibliography_of_work_on_Objectivism#Works_by_Ayn_Rand|Bibliography of work on Objectivism - Works by Ayn Rand]], [[Objectivism (Ayn Rand)]], [[Objectivism, Ayn Rand, and homosexuality]], [[Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand]], [[Randian hero]], [[Randism]], [[The Ayn Rand Collective]], [[The Ayn Rand Column]], [[The Ayn Rand Letter]], [[The Ayn Rand Lexicon]], [[The Early Ayn Rand]], [[The Passion of Ayn Rand]], [[:Category:Ayn Rand characters]], [[:Category:Books by Ayn Rand]], and [[:Template:AynRand]]. -- <fontspan facestyle="font-family:Kristen ITC;">'''[[User:Jreferee|<fontspan colorstyle="color:Blue;">Jreferee</fontspan>]]''' ^{''([[User talk:Jreferee|Talk]])''}</fontspan> 08:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

*'''Merge''' with [[Objectivist ethics]]. [[User:Lurker|<span style="background-color:lightblue;color:black">Lurker</span>]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Lurker|said]]&nbsp;'''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Lurker|done]])</span> 14:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' I don't agree with the whole Rand movement, but I cannot deny its notability, etc. [[User:Gregbard|Gregbard]] 08:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

*'''Keep''' The article has been improved. As it is notable according to [[WP:NN]] it likely should have been tagged for requiring citations instead of being nominated for deletion in the first place. The rationale for having the article deleted is more blunt on the article's talk page: x number of hits in a google search means afd. I suggest reading the [[WP:ATA]] page. [[User:Karbinski|Karbinski]] 13:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>