Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Brazil4Linux: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 28:
::: Actually "Rick", a "this user is a suspected sockpuppet of" template is NOT vandalism, given the fact that you ARE a suspected sockpuppet, and on top of that, I put it there at Pagrashtak's '''own''' suggestion, after we had discussed you at length. You've never "supported" anyone, all you did was call me a troll, just like you've always done from the start. That's the entire reason why I've PUT this check out- because I believe that you are the very same Brazil4Linux that's been stalking me for over half a year. A "suspected sockpuppet" template isn't vandalism- what you did (which I have very carefully detailed above), is vandalism, stalking (both on and off wikipedia), AND personal attacks. I don't think anyone who looks at the evidence will be disinclined to show me that you are indeed the very selfsame Brazil4Linux who was banned for bad behavior. [[User:Doom127|Daniel Davis]] 05:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
:Could you provide a list of known IPs used by Brazil4Linux for us to compare to? We don't generally reveal personal information like IP addresses; without a list, all we can do is reveal the IPs we find, which would be a violation of Rick Browser's privacy if they do not match. Providing a list of known IPs, particularly if you can provide on-Wikipedia evidence that they have been used by Brazil4Linux, will make it much easier for us to run a check, and for appropriate action to be taken if there is a connection. <
:: I have placed [[User:Doom127/knownip| here]] the list of IP known IP addresses that Brazil4Linux and his known sockpuppets have used on Wikipedia. There may be other IP addresses, of course- he has a tendency to switch his IP after each edit (but they all trace back to the same veloxzone or dialuol ___location).
Line 34:
::: Further revelations- even as I was compiling the list, this user placed a personal attack on the Request for Admin page of user Jedi6, someone whom with the Rick Browser username has had NO prior contact with- in fact, the only person who has ever to my knowledge bore a grudge against Jedi6 was in fact Brazil4Linux. You can take a look at it [[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Jedi6&action=history| here]]. [[User:Doom127|Daniel Davis]] 06:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
:'''Confirmed.''' The evidence suggests a strong link. <
{{Subst:Rcub}}
Line 50:
[[User:Doom127|Daniel Davis]] 06:33, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
'''Highly likely.''' <
<div style="text-align:center;">''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span><br />Subsequent requests related to this user should be made ''above'', in a new section.''</div></div>
Line 73:
:*Though User:GroundZero might not be a sockpuppet, the account should still be blocked since the username that was chosen is very similiar to administrator Ground Zero. [[User:Zscout370]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:Zscout370|(Return Fire)]] [[WP:FU|Fair use policy]] </sup></small> 14:33, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
::*Which you will note is why I blocked that account. The others were editwarring on articles Brazil4Linux was arguing on. All appeared during B4L block periods to continue edit wars. [[User:Alkivar|<span style="color:#FA8605;">'''ALKIVAR'''</span>]][[User_talk:Alkivar|™]][[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 21:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
<center>''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. <
</br>
</noinclude>
|