Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicode Font Viewer: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:57, 13 January 2010

Latest revision as of 13:57, 8 April 2023

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 15:

*'''Delete'''. An exhaustive search using the options in the findsources links above results in... nada. [[User:JBsupreme|JBsupreme]] ([[User talk:JBsupreme|talk]]) 18:53, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

<hr style="width:50%;" />

:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->{{#ifeq:{{BASEPAGENAME}}|Articles for deletion|[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]|}}

*'''Delete''', unremarkable freeware. The closest this comes to notability is being mentioned as number 11 out of 11 in "10+ Tools To View, Organize And Manage Your Fonts" from [http://www.gigglecomputer.com/2009/09/10-tools-to-view-organize-and-manage.html www.gigglecomputer.com]. And that's not very close to notability. [[User:Glenfarclas|<span style="background:#003F87;color:#EDEDED" vlink="color:#EDEDED;">'''&nbsp;'''Glenfarclas'''&nbsp;'''</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Glenfarclas|<span style="color:#003F87">talk</span>]]) 06:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' No sources, no article. [[User:Miami33139|Miami33139]] ([[User talk:Miami33139|talk]]) 21:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>