Content deleted Content added
→Aims: syntax, avoiding jargon, new sections, WLs |
WikiEditor50 (talk | contribs) clean up, replaced: Bush Administration → Bush administration |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Joint US Air Force-NASA study to replace the Titan, Atlas and Space Shuttle rockets}}
{{Refimprove|date=March 2017}}
Line 4 ⟶ 5:
==Background==
[[File:Space Launch System (16525420976).jpg|alt=rocket ship|thumb|An artist's rendering of the 2010s [[Space Launch System]], which contains some design heritage from the ALS]]
The ALS was a joint USAF and NASA study from 1987 to 1990. It was an endeavour of the years following the [[Space Shuttle Challenger disaster
Although the project had a projected [[
The ALS program office differed from others in that it was the only one within the [[Air Force Space Command]]. The office was furnished with [[Macintosh|Apple Mac OS personal computers]] instead of the Command's usual [[Microsoft Windows#Early versions|Microsoft Windows]] systems{{Citation needed|date=July 2021}}. This was in part because NASA had already been using Apple computers. The program office pioneered what later became the [[Microsoft Project]]{{Citation needed|reason=The Wikipedia page for Project does not mention ALS or the USAF|date=July 2021}}.
== Aims ==
Line 16 ⟶ 18:
== Progress ==
In 1989, the [[Presidency of George H. W. Bush|Bush
However, by late 1989, it was apparent that the ALS program was no longer required.<ref>"Air Force Embraces Expendable Launchers," Military Space, 17 July 1989, page 3-4.</ref> The initial phase of the SDI would employ existing [[Titan IV]] and [[Atlas II]] rockets. The launch requirements for subsequent phases of the SDI deployment were too vague to allow the immediate ongoing direction of the ALS program and its associated costs.<ref>"Adams, Peter, "Congress May Consider ALS Too Costly, Sources Say," Defense News, 27 March 1989, page 25.</ref><ref>Finnegan, Philip, "Report: ALS Program Lacks Mission, Should be Pared to Propulsion Study," Defense News, 25 September 1989, page 4.</ref>
|