Implicational hierarchy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m remove Erik9bot category,outdated, tag and general fixes, added orphan tag
update
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Unreferencedno footnotes|date=DecemberJuly 20092023}}
'''Implicational hierarchy''', in [[linguistics]], is a chain of implicational [[linguistic universal|universals]]. A set of chained universals is schematically shown as in (1):
{{Orphan|date=December 2009}}
 
'''Implicational hierarchy''' is a chain of implicational [[linguistic universal|universals]].
A set of chained universals is schematically shown as in (1):
 
(1) '''A < B < C < D'''
Line 29 ⟶ 26:
respectively:
(3) '''{{IPA|/ n /}} < {{IPA|/ m /}} < {{IPA|/ ɲ /}}'''
 
This hierarchy defines the following possible combinations of dental/alveolar, bilabial, and palatal voiced nasals in
Line 36 ⟶ 33:
(4)
{| class="wikitable"
! width="50"| ||width="30"|{{IPA|/ n /}} ||width="30"|{{IPA|/ m /}}||width="30"|{{IPA|/ ɲ /}}
|-
| Type 1: || align='center'|{{IPA|/ n /}} || align='center'|{{IPA|/ m /}} ||align='center'|{{IPA|/ ɲ /}}
|-
| Type 2: || align='center'|{{IPA|/ n /}} || align='center'|{{IPA|/ m /}} || align='center'|-
|-
| Type 3: || align='center'|{{IPA|/ n /}} || align='center'|- ||align='center'|-
|}
In other words, the hierarchy implies that there are no languages with {{IPA|/ ɲ /}} but without {{IPA|/ m /}} and {{IPA|/ n /}}, or with {{IPA|/ ɲ /}} and {{IPA|/ m /}} but without {{IPA|/ n /}}.
 
==Morphology==
Line 54 ⟶ 51:
 
==Syntax==
Implicational hierarchies also play a role in syntactic phenomena. For instance, in some languages (e.g. [[Tangut people|Tangut]]) the transitive verb agrees not with a subject, or the object, but with the syntactic argument which is higher on the person hierarchy.
 
(5) '''Person: first < second < third'''<br/>
Line 60 ⟶ 57:
See also: [[animacy]].
 
==Bibliography==
* Comrie, B. (1989). ''Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology.'' Oxford: Blackwell, 2nd edn.
* Croft, W. (1990). ''Typology and universals''. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.