Content deleted Content added
m remove Erik9bot category,outdated, tag and general fixes, added orphan tag |
update |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{
'''Implicational hierarchy''', in [[linguistics]], is a chain of implicational [[linguistic universal|universals]]. A set of chained universals is schematically shown as in (1):▼
▲'''Implicational hierarchy''' is a chain of implicational [[linguistic universal|universals]].
(1) '''A < B < C < D'''
Line 29 ⟶ 26:
respectively:
(3) '''{{IPA|/
This hierarchy defines the following possible combinations of dental/alveolar, bilabial, and palatal voiced nasals in
Line 36 ⟶ 33:
(4)
{| class="wikitable"
! width="50"| ||width="30"|{{IPA|/
|-
| Type 1: || align='center'|{{IPA|/
|-
| Type 2: || align='center'|{{IPA|/
|-
| Type 3: || align='center'|{{IPA|/
|}
In other words, the hierarchy implies that there are no languages with {{IPA|/
==Morphology==
Line 54 ⟶ 51:
==Syntax==
Implicational hierarchies also play a role in syntactic phenomena. For instance, in some languages (e.g. [[Tangut people|Tangut]]) the transitive verb agrees not with a subject, or the object, but with the syntactic argument which is higher on the person hierarchy.
(5) '''Person: first < second < third'''<br/>
Line 60 ⟶ 57:
See also: [[animacy]].
==Bibliography==
* Comrie, B. (1989). ''Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology.'' Oxford: Blackwell, 2nd edn.
* Croft, W. (1990). ''Typology and universals''. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
|