Talk:OASIS SOA Reference Model: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:15, 20 September 2006

Latest revision as of 13:26, 12 August 2023

(9 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{old prod}}{{WikiProject banner shell|class=}}

{{Ticket confirmation|source= http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/18487/wd-soa-rm-pr2.doc|id=2006100910007465}}

==Untitled==

OASIS, copyright holder for the article, "OASIS SOA Reference Model (SOA-RM)," grants permission to post this article on Wikipedia's under GFDL.

Line 4 ⟶ 8:

Director of Communications

OASIS

== Issues ==

===Quality / Notability / References===

I restructured the article in April and added some references but I did not remove the rewrite, notability and reference tags. While I agree that the article needs more work, I think the tags may now be removed. --[[User:RichardVeryard|RichardVeryard]] 10:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

:I removed the later to tags as I believe they have been addressed. I left the rewrite tag, because the bullet points need to be rewritten as prose.--<i>[[User:BirgitteSB|<span style="color:#9966FF;">Birgitte</span>]]<span style="color:#CC99CC; font-size:small;">SB</span></i> 13:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

===Context===

This is a big problem. The article on [[Service-oriented architecture|SOA]] is not good enough - because there isn't sufficient consensus about SOA concepts and principles - there is too much POV on the subject, mostly from IT vendors. The whole point of the OASIS reference model is to produce something better and more neutral. It is probably the best vendor-neutral account of SOA currently available (hence its notability) but it is not yet widely adopted, so it cannot yet be regarded as NPOV. This makes it very difficult for WP to clearly explain what SOA is as an introduction to this article without either adopting the OASIS account or alternatively adopting a more controversial (and possibly more confusing) account. --[[User:RichardVeryard|RichardVeryard]] 10:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)