Talk:Problematic integration theory: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:40, 12 October 2022

Latest revision as of 07:43, 13 August 2023

(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=}}

Line 16 ⟶ 18:

== CCTP 752 - Peer Review- Fall 2022 ==

TheThis pagearticle is well developed and the structure is organized in a clear manner. The content is rich and it covers most of the elements needed to understand this theory. Nevertheless, there is room for improvement in many sections. I will mention three urgent improvements that could be implemented to elevate the quality of the article and boost its nature as a Wikipedia page. First, the introduction at the beginning of the article lacks some links to other Wikipedia sites. Therethere are important keywords in the introduction without links, such as integration, problematic, cognitive… etc. these words are very important for the reader to understand the context of the theory. Second, the theory application section, which is called in the article: asCurrent “Current Usage”Usage, could be significantly improved. This section could be presented in sections by category; Health, Organizational Communication, Internal Bureaucracy…etc. Then under each category comes explanationexplanations with some practical examples. This structure would facilitate knowledge consumption by readers. Third, there are no visual images to explain the different elements of the theory. Adding some visuals to “The concepts”concepts'' and the “Assumptions” sections could improve the quality of the article significantly. [[User:CD1074|CD1074]] ([[User talk:CD1074|talk]]) 10:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

== CCTP 752 - Peer Review - Fall 2022 ==

Hello! This page currently provides a comprehensive and unbiased overview of the theory. One direction you could take is to expand on other ways that PI has been applied. This could also encourage the usage of other citations, which presents one major problem with this page. Although, this page includes 28 references, they are sourced from 3 authors, further, Barbow’s multiple citations come from the same book and page.

Another problem with the page is the inclusion of UMT, complete with a section header and full overview of this theory, but without linking the actual page) [[Uncertainty management theory|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_management_theory]]

With these updates our Wikiproject can continue to provide shareable knowledge on Communication Theory. [[User:Dj922|Dj922]] ([[User talk:Dj922|talk]]) 02:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

== CCTP 752 - Peer Review- Fall 2022 ==

This article has a clear structure and easy to read for those who are not familiar with this theory. Currently, the sources are not diverse enough to provide a neutral view on the topic. In addition, one area to improve might be to organize or combine the notes and references section.

The “Current usage” section can be changed to “Applications”. Few points made under the “Current usage” page can also be organized into subtopics to increase readability.

Furthermore, there are opportunities to explore more up-to-dates researches on the problematic integration theory. For example, in Calderon article: "[https://wrlc-gu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_journals_2622953433&context=PC&vid=01WRLC_GUNIV:01WRLC_GUNIV&lang=en&search_scope=WRLC_GT_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any%2Ccontains%2C%22problematic%20integration%20theory%22&sortby=date_d&offset=0 Introducing a Critical Approach to Studies of Uncertainty: Engaging Uncertainty with Hispanic Adults in Colorado during the COVID-19 Health Crisis]". It provides new insight on factors that determine what kinds and how uncertainty comes to be experienced by particular individual building on theories including the problematic integration theory. [[User:Ema554|Ema554]] ([[User talk:Ema554|talk]]) 07:07, 18 October 2022 (UTC)