Kaplansky's theorem on quadratic forms: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:36, 22 April 2021

Latest revision as of 23:16, 18 August 2023

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{short description|A resultResult on simultaneous representation of primes by quadratic forms}}

In [[mathematics]], '''Kaplansky's theorem on quadratic forms''' is a result on simultaneous representation of [[Prime number|primes]] by [[quadratic forms]]. It was proved in 2003 by [[Irving Kaplansky]].<ref>{{citation

| last = Kaplansky | first = Irving | authorlink = Irving Kaplansky

Line 29:

==Examples==

*The prime ''p''&nbsp;=&nbsp;17 is congruent to 1 modulo 16 and is representable by neither ''x''²&nbsp;+&nbsp;32''y''² nor ''x''²&nbsp;+&nbsp;64''y''².

*The prime ''p''&nbsp;=&nbsp;113 is congruent to 1 modulo 16 and is representable by both ''x''²&nbsp;+&nbsp;32''y''² and ''x''²+64''y''² (since 113&nbsp;=&nbsp;9²&nbsp;+&nbsp;32×1² and 113&nbsp;=&nbsp;7²&nbsp;+&nbsp;64×1²).

*The prime ''p''&nbsp;=&nbsp;41 is congruent to 9 modulo 16 and is representable by ''x''²&nbsp;+&nbsp;32''y''² (since 41&nbsp;=&nbsp;3²&nbsp;+&nbsp;32×1²), but not by ''x''²&nbsp;+&nbsp;64''y''².

*The prime ''p''&nbsp;=&nbsp;73 is congruent to 9 modulo 16 and is representable by ''x''²&nbsp;+&nbsp;64''y''² (since 73&nbsp;=&nbsp;3²&nbsp;+&nbsp;64×1²), but not by ''x''²&nbsp;+&nbsp;32''y''².

Line 43:

| title = Five peculiar theorems on simultaneous representation of primes by quadratic forms

| volume = 129

| year = 2009}}.</ref>| doi-access =

}}.</ref>

*A prime ''p'' congruent to 1 modulo 20 is representable by both or none of ''x''²&nbsp;+&nbsp;20''y''² and ''x''²&nbsp;+&nbsp;100''y''², whereas a prime ''p'' congruent to 9 modulo 20 is representable by exactly one of these quadratic forms.