Content deleted Content added
Anomalocaris (talk | contribs) m rm spurious italics ('') |
m Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot. |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{short description|Result on simultaneous representation of primes by quadratic forms}}
In [[mathematics]], '''Kaplansky's theorem on quadratic forms''' is a result on simultaneous representation of [[Prime number|primes]] by [[quadratic forms]]. It was proved in 2003 by [[Irving Kaplansky]].<ref>{{citation
| last = Kaplansky | first = Irving | authorlink = Irving Kaplansky
Line 8 ⟶ 9:
| title = The forms {{math|''x'' + 32''y''<sup>2</sup> and ''x'' + 64''y''^2}} {{sic}}
| volume = 131
| year = 2003
}}.</ref>
==Statement of the theorem==
Line 27 ⟶ 29:
==Examples==
*The prime ''p'' = 17 is congruent to 1 modulo 16 and is representable by neither ''x''<sup>2</sup> + 32''y''<sup>2</sup> nor ''x''<sup>2</sup> + 64''y''<sup>2</sup>.
*The prime ''p'' = 113 is congruent to 1 modulo 16 and is representable by both ''x''<sup>2</sup> + 32''y''<sup>2</sup> and ''x''<sup>2</sup>+64''y''<sup>2</sup> (since 113 = 9<sup>2</sup> +
*The prime ''p'' = 41 is congruent to 9 modulo 16 and is representable by ''x''<sup>2</sup> + 32''y''<sup>2</sup> (since 41 = 3<sup>2</sup> +
*The prime ''p'' = 73 is congruent to 9 modulo 16 and is representable by ''x''<sup>2</sup> + 64''y''<sup>2</sup> (since 73 = 3<sup>2</sup> +
==Similar results==
Line 41 ⟶ 43:
| title = Five peculiar theorems on simultaneous representation of primes by quadratic forms
| volume = 129
| year = 2009
}}.</ref>
*A prime ''p'' congruent to 1 modulo 20 is representable by both or none of ''x''<sup>2</sup> + 20''y''<sup>2</sup> and ''x''<sup>2</sup> + 100''y''<sup>2</sup>, whereas a prime ''p'' congruent to 9 modulo 20 is representable by exactly one of these quadratic forms.
|