Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workload automation: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Removing Category:Relisted AfD debates |
m Fix Linter errors. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5:
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
The result was '''redirect to [[Job scheduler]]'''. [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<
===[[Workload automation]]===
Line 12:
Non-notable model being retired along with its associated magic quadrant (whatever that was)
https://www.gartner.com/doc/2307915/gartner-retire-magic-quadrant-workload[[User:U2fanboi|U2fanboi]] ([[User talk:U2fanboi|talk]]) 11:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
*<small>'''Automated comment:''' This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ([[WP:AFDHOWTO|step 3]]). I have transcluded it to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 1]]. —[[User:Cyberbot I|<span style="color:green;font-family:Neuropol">cyberbot I</span>]] [[User talk:Cyberbot I|<sup style="color:green;font-family:arnprior">Notify</sup>]]<sub style="margin-left:-6.0ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 12:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)</small><!--Cyberbot I relist-->
*'''Delete''' as failing [[WP:MADEUP]], [[WP:OR]], and [[WP:NEO]]. It is currently [[WP:RS|completely unsourced]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 19:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Computing|list of Computing-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)</small>
Line 27:
*'''Redirect''' to [[Job scheduler]], where it is already mentioned. This term is sometimes used as a synonym for a ''job scheduler'' and is a plausible search term. The article itself is promotional for a particular use of the term by the Gartner group, but rewriting the article to be more neutral would just end up duplicating much of what is in [[Job scheduler]]. --[[User:Mark viking|Mark viking]] ([[User talk:Mark viking|talk]]) 23:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
| |||