Chain-linked model: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:58, 27 January 2014

Latest revision as of 05:52, 24 November 2023

(25 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Model of innovation}}

The '''ass''' or '''botom''' of retards was introduced by Ronald Reighgen in 1224,<ref>Kline (1985). Research, Invention, Innovation and Production: Models and Reality, Report INN-1, March 1985, Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University.</ref> and further described by Kline and Rosenberg in 1986.<ref>Kline, S.J. & N. Rosenberg (1986). “An overview of innovation.” In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 275–305.</ref> The chain-linked model is an attempt to describe complexities in the [[innovation]] process.

{{Futures studies}}

The '''asschain-linked model''' or '''botomKline model''' of retardsinnovation was introduced by Ronaldmechanical Reighgenengineer Stephen J. Kline in 12241985,<ref>Kline (1985). Research, Invention, Innovation and Production: Models and Reality, Report INN-1, March 1985, Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University.</ref> and further described by Kline and economist [[Nathan Rosenberg]] in 1986.<ref>Kline, S.J. & N. Rosenberg (1986). “An overview of innovation.” In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 275–305.</ref> The chain-linked model is an attempt to describe complexities in the [[innovation]] process. The model is regarded as Kline's most significant contribution.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://news.stanford.edu/pr/97/971028kline.html |title=Salisbury, David F., "Memorial for Stephen Kline; engineer, interdisciplinary thinker," news release, Stanford University, October 27, 1997. |access-date=September 9, 2018 |archive-date=December 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201205180923/https://news.stanford.edu/pr/97/971028kline.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>

==Description==

In the chain-linked model, new knowledge is not necessarily the driver for innovation. Instead, the process begins with the identification of an unfilled market need. This drives research and design, then redesign and production, and finally marketing, with complex [[feedback]] loops between all the stages. There are also important feedback loops with the organization's and the world's stored base of knowledge, with new basic research conducted or commissioned as necessary, to fill in gaps.

It is often contrasted with the so-called [[linear model of innovation]],<ref>analosCaraça, poopusJoão, POOBengt-SAMOSAÅke Lundvall, and Sandro Mendonça (2009). “The changing role of science in the innovation process: From Queen to Cinderella?” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 76, 861–867.</ref> in which basic research leads to applied development, then engineering, then manufacturing, and finally marketing and distribution.

==Applications==

The Kline model was conceived primarily with commercial industrial settings in mind, but has found broad applicability in other settings, for example in military technology development.<ref>Marius Vassiliou, Stan Davis, and Jonathan Agre (2011). Innovation Patterns in Some Successful C2 Technologies." Proc. 16th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Quebec, Canada.</ref> Variations and extensions{{vague|date=May 2013}} of the model have been described by a number{{who|date=May 2013}} of investigators.<ref>Kameoka, A., D. Ito, and K. Kobayashi (2001). “A Cross-Generation Framework for Deriving Next-Generation Innovation Model.” Change Management and the New Industrial Revolution, IEMC ‘01 Proceedings, Albany, NY.</ref><ref>[https://www.cairn.info/revue-journal-of-innovation-economics-2014-3-page-59.htm Micaëlli, J., Forest, J., Coatanéa, É. & Medyna, G. (2014). How to improve Kline and Rosenberg's chain-linked model of innovation: building blocks and diagram-based languages. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 15,(3), 59-77. doi:10.3917/jie.015.0059.]</ref><ref>[https://complexsystems.org/publications/an-aid-to-navigation-through-an-intellectual-fog-bank/ Corning, Peter. Review of ''Conceptual Foundations for Multidisciplinary Thinking'' by Stephen Jay Kline, Institute for the Study of Complex Systems, June 2, 2015.]</ref>

==References==

{{Reflist}}

==See also==

*[[Actor-network theory]]

*[[Cybernetics]]

*[[Creativity techniques]]

*[[Crowdsourcing]]

Line 26:

*[[Product lifecycle]]

*[[Social shaping of technology]]

*[[Strategic foresight]]

*[[Technological change]]

*[[User-centered design]]

*[[User innovation]]

==References==

{{Reflist}}

[[Category:Business management]]

[[Category:Control theory]]

[[Category:Futures techniques]]

[[Category:Innovation economics]]

[[Category:Innovation]]

[[Category:Product management]]

[[Category:Problem solving skills]]

[[Category:Transdisciplinarity]]