Content deleted Content added
m Typo fixing per WP:HYPHEN, sub-subsection 3, points 3,4,5, replaced: statistically- → statistically , experimentally- → experimentally using AWB (8062) |
m Removing link(s) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rule-developing experimentation closed as delete (XFDcloser) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Test variations of web page elements to find the best one}}
'''Multivariate landing page optimization''' (MVLPO) is a specific form of [[landing page optimization]] where multiple variations of visual elements (e.g., graphics, text) on a webpage are evaluated. For example, a given page may have ''k'' choices for the title, ''m'' choices for the featured image or graphic, and ''n'' choices for the company logo. This example yields ''k×m×n'' landing page configurations.
Line 8 ⟶ 9:
Multivariate landing page optimization is based on [[experimental design]] (e.g., [[discrete choice]], [[conjoint analysis]], [[Taguchi methods]], [[IDDEA]], etc.), which tests a structured combination of webpage elements. Some vendors (e.g., Memetrics.com) use a "full factorial" approach, which tests all possible combinations of elements. This approach requires a smaller sample size—typically, many thousands—than traditional fractional Taguchi designs to achieve [[statistical significance]]. This quality is one reason that [[choice modeling]] won the [[Nobel Prize]] in 2000. Fractional designs typically used in simulation environments require the testing of small subsets of possible combinations, and have a higher [[margin of error]]. Some critics of the approach question the possible interactions between the elements of the webpages, and the inability of most fractional designs to address this issue.
To resolve the limitations of fractional designs, an advanced simulation method based on the
|author=Howard R. Moskowitz
|
|title=[[Selling Blue Elephants]]: How to make great products that people want BEFORE they even know they want them
|publisher=Wharton School Publishing
|date=2007-04-11
|pages=272
|isbn=0-13-613668-0}}</ref> RDE creates individual models for each respondent, discovers any and all [[synergies]] and suppressions among the elements,<ref>Alex Gofman. 2006. Emergent Scenarios, Synergies, And Suppressions Uncovered within Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies, 21(4): 373-414. {{doi|10.1111/j.1745-459X.2006.00072.x}}</ref>
|url=http://www.ftpress.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1015178
|title=Improving the ‘Stickiness’ of Your Website
Line 39 ⟶ 40:
== Simulation (survey) execution ==
In simulation (survey) MVLPO execution, the foundation consists of advanced [[market research]] techniques. In the research phase, the respondents are directed to a survey that presents them with a set of experimentally designed combinations of a landing page. The respondents rate each version based on some factor (e.g., purchase intent). At the end of the research phase, [[regression analysis]] models are created either for individual pages or for the entire panel of pages. The outcome relates the presence or absence of page elements on the different landing page executions to the respondents’ ratings. These results can be used to synthesize new landing pages as combinations of the top-scoring elements optimized for subgroups or [[market segments]], with or without interactions.<ref>Alex Gofman, Howard Moskowitz, and Tonis Mets. 2009. Integrating Science into Web Design: Consumer Driven Website Optimization. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(4): 286-298. {{doi|10.1108/07363760910965882}}.</ref>
Simulation execution has the following advantages:
Line 53 ⟶ 54:
<references/>
[[Category:Search engine optimization]]
[[Category:Market research]]
| |||