Content deleted Content added
rm move request template - no consensus |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles}}. |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles|importance=low}}
}}
== Classification ==
Line 24 ⟶ 27:
*'''Support'''. This particular species is a perfect example of why [[Linnaean taxonomy]] makes more sense for animal articles. Common names are all too often entirely localized, inaccurate, out-dated (python?), or in this snake's case - in large number. Who is to say which is the "most common" usage? I've read and heard every variation mentioned in the article, and a few others that are not - I couldn't say any one is widely preferred over another. Though, I usually just defer to the article's original author when dealing with these kind of issues to prevent edit warring, unless it's glaringly wrong. -[[User:Dawson|Dawson]] ([[User talk:Dawson|talk]]) 23:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Weak oppose''', because it depends on evidence of actual usage, which has not been presented by either side. But we should use common names when they are common and unambiguous; if they are also wrong or misleading, ''explain'' why to the reader. [[User:Pmanderson|Septentrionalis]] <small>[[User talk:Pmanderson|PMAnderson]]</small> 14:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.''</div><!-- Template:pollbottom -->
Placement of this species in the genus ''Charina'' is a mistake. Recent molecular work shows unambiguously that ''Calabaria'' not only belongs in its own genus, it belongs in its own subgroup, Calabariidae. See: Pyron, R.A., Burbrink, F.T., Wiens, J.J., 2013. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC evolutionary biology 13, 93. The article needs to be revised accordingly. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.147.86.2|81.147.86.2]] ([[User talk:81.147.86.2|talk]]) 23:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== External links modified ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified {{plural:1|one external link|1 external links}} on [[Calabar python]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=749159513 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080826044449/http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu:80/ to http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the ''checked'' parameter below to '''true''' or '''failed''' to let others know (documentation at {{tlx|Sourcecheck}}).
{{sourcecheck|checked=false}}
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 20:11, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
| |||