Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| (27 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
The '''current injection technique''' is a technique developed to reduce the turn-OFF switching transient of power bipolar [[semiconductor]] devices. It was developed and published by Dr S. Eio of [[Staffordshire University]] ([[United
▲The '''current injection technique''' is a technique developed to reduce the turn-OFF switching transient of power bipolar [[semiconductor]] devices. It was developed and published by Dr S. Eio of Staffordshire University (United Knigdom) in 2007.
== Background ==
The Turn-OFF switching transient of [[
Different techniques, such as carrier lifetime control, injection efficiency and buffer layer devices, have been used to minimize
== Details of the Technique ==
The current injection technique examined in Dr Eio's publications optimize the switching transient of power diodes, thyristors and Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs) without the need of changing the structure of these devices. To implement the current injection technique, a [[current]] injection circuit was developed with results indicating that the injection of an additional current during its switching transient can reduce the reverse recovery charge of a given power diode and thyristor, and also reduce the tail current of an IGBT. ▼
▲The current injection technique examined in Dr Eio's publications optimize the switching transient of power
Practical experimental results on [[diode]]s and [[thyristor]]s showed that the amplitude of the injected current required is proportional to the peak reverse recovery current and proved that these devices experience a momentary increase in recombination of current carriers during the injection of the additional current. This help to prevent the device from conducting large negative current, which in turn reduce its reverse recovery charge and reverse recovery time. Results obtained from experiments with an IGBT showed a significant reduction in the time where current falls to zero when opposing current was injected into the device during its turn-off transient. Further simulation results from numerical modeling showed that the injected opposing current temporary increase recombination in the device and therefore reduce the extracted excess carriers that was stored within the device. ▼
▲Practical experimental results on [[diode]]s and [[thyristor]]s showed that the amplitude of the injected current required is proportional to the peak reverse recovery current and proved that these devices experience a momentary increase in recombination of current carriers during the injection of the additional current. This help to prevent the device from conducting large negative current, which in turn reduce its reverse recovery charge and reverse recovery time. Results obtained from experiments with
To prevent circuit commutation and bonding between the current injection circuit and the main test circuit where the Device under Test (DUT) is connected to, a non-invasive circuit was developed to magnetically couple the two circuits. ▼
▲To prevent circuit commutation and bonding between the current injection circuit and the main test circuit where the
In summary, the proposed technique makes it possible to use devices with low forward voltage drop for high frequency applications. This also imply cheaper cost of devices as less processing steps are required during the manufacturing stages where the need of carrier lifetime control techniques are reduced.n test circuit where the Device under Test (DUT) is connected to, a non-invasive circuit was developed to magnetically couple the two circuits. This removed the need for the semiconductor device used in the current injection circuit to have high breakdown voltage rating and also provided electrical isolation. Typical application of this technique in an inductive load chopper circuit showed a significant reduction in the IGBT tail current, and the reverse recovery time and charge of the freewheeling diode used.▼
▲In summary,
== References ==
{{reflist}}
;Notes
▲1.S. Eio., N. Shammas., “IGBT Tail Current Reduction by Current Injection,” 43rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference, Padova, Italy,1 – 4 September 2008
▲2.S. Eio., N. Shammas., “A chopper circuit with current injection technique for increasing operating frequency,” 9th International Seminar On Power Semiconductors, Prague, Czech Republic, 27-29 August 2008
▲3.S. Eio., N. Shammas., “Switching Transient of Power Diode,” 41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 6 - 8 September 2006, Volume 2, P. 564 – 568, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109 / UPEC.2006.367541
▲4.N. Shammas., S. Eio., “A Novel Technique to Reduce the Reverse Recovery Charge of a Power Diode,” 12th European Power Electronics and Applications, EPE 2007, Aalborg, Denmark, 2 - 5 September. 2007 P.1 – 8, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109 / EPE.2007.4417713
▲5.N. Shammas., S. Eio., “A Novel Technique to Reduce the Reverse Recovery Charge of a Power Thyristor,” 42nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference, Brighton, United Kingdom, 4 – 6 September 2007, p.1222 – 1227, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109 / UPEC.2007.4469126
▲6.N. Shammas., S. Eio., D. Chamund., “Semiconductor Devices and Their Use in Power Electronic Applications,” World Scientific and Eng. Academy and Society, Venice, Italy, 21 -23 Nov 2007
▲7.N.Shammas, S.Eio, S.Nathan, K.Shukry, D.Chamund., “Thermal Aspects of Power Semiconductor Devices and Systems,” VII Conference Thermal Problems in Electronics, MicroTherm’07, 24 – 28 June 2007, Lodz, Poland
[[Category:Semiconductors| ]]▼
{{DEFAULTSORT:Current Injection Technique}}
| |||