Template talk:.NET Framework version history: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:19, 5 January 2021

Latest revision as of 02:44, 20 January 2024

(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|

{{WikiProject Microsoft}}

|}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aanautomatic archive navigator}}

|maxarchivesize = 200K100K

|counter = 141

|algo = old(30d90d)

|archive = Template talk:.NET Framework version history/Archive %(counter)d

|minthreadsleft = 4

|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{ArchiveThisNowPlease}},{{resolved|,{{Resolved|,{{done}},{{Done}}</nowiki>

}}

{{archives|age=90|bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}

{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

|target=Talk:.NET Framework version history/Archive index

|mask=Talk:.NET Framework version history/Archive <#>

|leading_zeros=0

|indexhere=yes}}

{{archivebox|auto=yes}}

== What kinda release of Windows Server 2003 distribute .net framework 2.0? ==

I just wish this is Wikipedia.org not Microsoft Official website! Fact is just Fact, should never be modified.

Windows Server 2003 was released in year 2003, when .net framework 2.0 was not about releasing at all. For the ever Windows .net Server, the .net framework 1.1 was the default .net framework included in the Windows Server 2003 installation media, also the dot net framework 1.0 was included on the Windows XP Service Pack 1 media. They might be just the partial, runtime or demonstration but they were there, and that is the fact. This is the section to tell the history, why should be affected by anything that is meaningless at all?! <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Janagewen|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Janagewen|contribs]]) 02:54, 13 August 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

:Hello, {{u|Janagewen}}

:Do you have proof in the form of [[WP:RS|reliable secondary source]]? If yes, then all your problems are solved.

:Best regards,

:[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 20:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

:I removed what I posted here because of your behaviours, and I got a warning about being blocked here! That is for what? I think you, Codename List, had better show respect to yourself before anything. You could do anything to my account without needing telling me again and again. I don't want to have any biz with you, Codename Lisa! [[User:Janagewen|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen|talk]]) 01:37, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

According to MS FAQ<ref>https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/17455/lifecycle-support-policy-faq-net-framework</ref> in the 10th question "What is the Support Lifecycle policy for the different versions of .NET Framework?", ".NET Framework 1.1 SP1 will continue to be supported until end of support of Windows Server 2003 SP2 (with 32-bit only, not 64-bit)."

That's confirm 1.1 SP1 to have been delivered within the SP2 of Windows Server 2003.

And if .NET 2.0 is new in 2003 R2 (6th note in the template), it means it is NOT part of 2003, isn't it? <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/195.65.52.7|195.65.52.7]] ([[User talk:195.65.52.7#top|talk]]) 13:06, 23 August 2016 (UTC)</small>

:I am so glad that you paid attention to this topic. Definitely, .net framework 2.0 is not part of Windows Server 2003, but an integrated part of Windows Server 2003 R2. I should have to make clear another thing, .net framework 1.1 SP1 is not delivered by SP2 of Windows Server 2003, but an integrated part too. Sorry to reply late, but late is better than never come. -- Aaron Janagewen [[Special:Contributions/139.210.139.160|139.210.139.160]] ([[User talk:139.210.139.160|talk]]) 13:08, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

::{{tq|"That's confirm 1.1 SP1 to have been delivered within the SP2 of Windows Server 2003."}}

::'''Bzzzt! Wrong.''' That only proves the support policy is aligned for the convenience of the supporter.

::{{tq|"And if .NET 2.0 is new in 2003 R2 [...]"}}

::Says who? The source says it isn't. It says it was included in 2003. Why don't you guys level that with Microsoft? Wikipedia is a downstream publisher anyway.

::Best regards,

::[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 14:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Why not just check the installer media for RTM, SP1, SP2, R2, Enterprise, Standard, and so on variations, and make a table? There's official checksums for the images MS supplied people. Heck, you can even still download a lot of them if you have the right accounts. Anyone got legal access to official media and not just unapproved pirated copies(granted, byte-for-byte copies of exact same disc images)? You don't even need a new PC, just install in a VM. BTW: Physical media is not really popular, anymore for those that wonder why I mention disc images. [[Special:Contributions/73.95.135.127|73.95.135.127]] ([[User talk:73.95.135.127|talk]]) 11:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

== Before reverting or changing... ==

Leave your reasons or proofs to reverting or modifying the main article! This is Wikipedia.org, we should maintain the right of everyone to work together... [[User:Janagewen|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen|talk]]) 05:30, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

:And you are violating the right of everyone to edit. Per [[WP:BRD]], if you are reverted, you are not allowed to counter-revert. This is exactly what you are doing and it is called [[WP:EW|edit warring]]. [[User:FleetCommand|Fleet Command]] ([[User talk:FleetCommand|talk]]) 05:36, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

: For you, [[User:FleetCommand|Fleet Command]], do learn self-respect! OK? [[User:Janagewen|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen|talk]]) 06:16, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

== <s>Suggest an alternative revision</s> ==

<div style="text-decoration: line-through">

<s>

{|class="wikitable"

|+Overview of .NET Framework release history

Line 76 ⟶ 40:

|-

|[[.NET Framework version history#.NET Framework 4.5.3|4.5.3]]||4||TBA||{{N/A}}||[[Windows 10|10]]||2015||4.5.2

|}</div>

|}

{{Refbegin}}

<s>About date format, because .net framework is a product of Microsoft, a North American international corporation. In order to avoiding the confusion, using American Standard Date format to state its precise release date.</s>

{{Refend}}

<s>This revision is provided for '''kind and nice editors from all over the world''' who want to improve the template in the main article. Any critic is welcome, but modifications to it for improving its qualities are much more welcome. But I do anti-"Nazi"! [[User:Janagewen|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen|talk]]) 00:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)</s>

:<s> For involving modifying this template I have experienced being blocked twice, and I try to replace it with my revision, it was reverted for more than 3 times. If you, any reader, not a stupid or woodenhead, you would find it is the most ridiculous template stating information on .net framework. All the seemed-reasonable references attached to that template is the just the confusion for its original writer about .net framework. Guys, here, Jeh, Codename Lisa and Fleetcommand are worse. I just wish there would be someone would balance the balance, not to mislead readers too much. [[User:Janagewen|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen|talk]]) 23:22, 21 November 2014 (UTC) </s>

:: If you start labeling people "woodenhead" (whatever that means) instead of listening to them, you end up in world full of woodenheads that has no "reader" in it. Your table is horribly vague and your English language is awful. You should have gotten the hint when you were blocked the first time. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/46.62.182.2|46.62.182.2]] ([[User talk:46.62.182.2|talk]]) 06:22, 22 November 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP -->

Line 116 ⟶ 79:

== Importance of .NET Standard ==

The importance of .NET Standard is that it a unifying concept between .NET Core and .NET Standard. This will be clear when .NET Standard 2.0 will be released because it the first version that will be compatible with both of: a version of .NET Framework (v 4.6.1) and a version of .NET Core ( v 2.0)<ref>https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet/2016/09/26/introducing-net-standard/</ref> Its release date is Q3 2017.<ref>https://githubwww.techsguide.com/dotnet/core/blob/master/roadmap.md</ref> No such unification or portability of code is available today.

Saying that, I would ask for not reverting [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:.NET_Framework_version_history&oldid=772679169| my edit]] of this template that added a column containing .NET Standard [[User:اقرأ|read]] ([[User talk:اقرأ|talk]]) 18:24, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

:Hello, {{u|اقرأ}}

Line 122 ⟶ 85:

:What you say is the importance of the standard itself, not the significance of the values you wrote in the table. Those values communicate zero meaning to the ordinary reader because they are not put in context. Without context, they have zero meaning for the reader.

:Best regards,<br/>[[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 23:39, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}