Content deleted Content added
revise cats |
m Duplicate word removed + |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Screening method}}
The '''elementary effects (EE) method''' is the most used{{Citation needed|date=January 2010}} screening method in [[sensitivity analysis]]. It is applied to identify non-influential inputs for a computationally costly [[mathematical model]] or for a model with a large number of inputs, where the costs of estimating other sensitivity analysis measures such as the variance-based measures is not affordable. Like all screening, the EE method provides qualitative sensitivity analysis measures, i.e. measures which allow the identification of non-influential inputs or which allow to rank the input factors in order of importance, but do not quantify exactly the relative importance of the inputs.▼
Published in 1991 by Max Morris<ref>https://www.stat.iastate.edu/people/max-morris Home Page of Max D. Morris at [[Iowa State University]]</ref> the '''elementary effects (EE) method'''<ref name="Morris"/> is one of the most used<ref>Borgonovo, Emanuele, and Elmar Plischke. 2016. “Sensitivity Analysis: A Review of Recent Advances.” European Journal of Operational Research 248 (3): 869–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2015.06.032. </ref><ref>Iooss, Bertrand, and Paul Lemaître. 2015. “A Review on Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods.” In Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems, edited by G. Dellino and C. Meloni, 101–22. Boston, MA: Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8_5. </ref><ref>Norton, J.P. 2015. “An Introduction to Sensitivity Assessment of Simulation Models.” Environmental Modelling & Software 69 (C): 166–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.020. </ref><ref>Wei, Pengfei, Zhenzhou Lu, and Jingwen Song. 2015. “Variable Importance Analysis: A Comprehensive Review.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 142: 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.018.</ref> screening methods in [[sensitivity analysis]].
▲
==Methodology==
Line 6 ⟶ 9:
To exemplify the EE method, let us assume to consider a mathematical model with <math> k </math> input factors. Let <math> Y </math> be the output of interest (a scalar for simplicity):
: <math> Y =
The original EE method of Morris <ref name="Morris">Morris, M. D. (1991). Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. ''Technometrics'', '''33''', 161–174.</ref> provides two sensitivity measures for each input factor:
* the measure <math> \mu </math>, assessing the overall importance of an input factor on the model output;
* the measure <math> \sigma </math>, describing [[Nonlinear system|non-linear]] effects and interactions.
These two measures are obtained through a design based on the construction of a series of [[Trajectory|trajectories]] in the space of the inputs, where inputs are randomly moved One-At-a-Time (OAT).
In this design, each model input is assumed to vary across <math>p</math> selected levels in the space of the input factors. The region of experimentation <math>\Omega</math> is thus a <math>k</math>-dimensional <math>p</math>-level grid.
Each trajectory is composed of <math>(k+1)</math> points since input factors move one by one of a step <math> \Delta </math> in <math>\{0, 1/(p-1),
Along each trajectory the so
: <math> d_i(X) = \frac{Y(X_1, \ldots ,X_{i-1}, X_i + \Delta, X_{i+1}, \ldots, X_k ) - Y( \mathbf X)}{\Delta}
where <math> \mathbf{X} = (X_1, X_2, ... X_k)</math> is any selected value in <math> \Omega </math> such that the transformed point is still in <math> \Omega </math> for each index <math> i=1,\ldots, k. </math>
<math> r </math> elementary effects are estimated for each input <math> d_i\left(X^{(1)} \right), d_i\left( X^{(2)} \right), \ldots, d_i\left( X^{(r)} \right) </math> by [[Random sampling|randomly sampling]] <math> r </math> points <math> X^{(1)}, X^{(2)}, \ldots , X^{(r)}</math>.
Usually <math> r </math> ~ 4-10, depending on the number of input factors, on the [[computational cost]] of the model and on the choice of the number of levels <math> p </math>, since a high number of levels to be explored needs to be balanced by a high number of trajectories, in order to obtain an exploratory sample. It is demonstrated that a convenient choice for the
p/[2(p-1)]</math>, as this ensures equal probability of sampling in the input space.
In case input factors are not uniformly distributed, the best practice is to sample in the space of the quantiles and to obtain the inputs values using inverse cumulative distribution functions. Note that in this case <math> \Delta </math> equals the step taken by the inputs in the space of the quantiles.
The two measures <math> \mu </math> and <math> \sigma </math> are defined as the mean and the [[standard deviation]] of the distribution of the elementary effects of each input:<br />
: <math> \mu_i = \frac{1}{r} \sum_{j=1}^r d_i \left( X^{(j)} \right) </math>,
: <math> \sigma_i = \sqrt{ \frac{1}{(r-1)} \sum_{j=1}^r \left( d_i \left( X^{(j)} \right) - \mu_i
These two measures need to be read together (e.g. on a two-dimensional graph
An improvement
1509–1518.</ref>
: <math> \mu_i^* = \frac{1}{r} \sum_{j=1}^r \left| d_i \left( X^{(j)} \right) \right| </math>.
The use of <math> \mu^* </math> solves the problem of the effects of opposite signs which occurs when the model is non-[[Monotonic function|monotonic]] and which can cancel each other out, thus resulting in a low value for <math> \mu </math>
An efficient technical scheme to construct the trajectories used in the EE method is presented in the original paper by Morris while an improvement strategy aimed at better exploring the input space is proposed by Campolongo et al..
Line 47 ⟶ 50:
{{reflist}}
[[Category:
[[Category:Sensitivity analysis]]
| |||