Content deleted Content added
Ira Leviton (talk | contribs) m Fixed a typo in a reference. Please see Category:CS1 errors: unsupported parameter. |
Undid revision 1198051518 by Maxim Masiutin (talk) broke citation templates; |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 13:
==Creation of the Human Reproduction Unit==
Since the first United Nations [[World Population Conference]], held in [[Rome]] in 1954, the [[United Nations]] had a growing interest in the issue of demography and associated it with the economic difficulties of developing countries. following a request of the [[UN General Assembly]],<ref>{{Cite
As the Second World Population Conference was meeting in [[Belgrade]] in 1965, the WHO was wondering how it could contribute.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/88958|title=Decisions of the United Nations affecting WHO's activities: resolution 1048 (XXXVII) of the Economic and Social Council|date=March 9, 1965|hdl=10665/88958 }}</ref> For the Director-General, as he said in a report demanded by the WHO Executive Council, "the importance of many medical, biological, social, cultural and economic factors in human reproduction makes it a major public health problem",<ref name="auto"/> which justified the decision to work on the demographic question, especially via the subject of human reproduction. The report was approved by the [[World Health Assembly]], and it was decided to study sterility, the regulation of fertility, and the health aspect of demography.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/89329|title=Programme activities in the health aspects of world population which might be developed by WHO|date=March 9, 1965|hdl=10665/89329 }}</ref> This mark the beginning of the Human Reproduction Unit. Its mission was to give technical advice on human reproduction aspects that were involved in public health.
==Development of the Unit and creation of a global program of research==
The Human Reproduction Unit continued its mission and expanded its research not to only take into account strictly the medical aspect of human reproduction, but also economic, sociological, cultural, and psychological factors. The Unit was organizing meetings of experts and began to create a centre of documentation on human reproduction. In 1970, the WHO designated the Reproductive Endocrinology Research Unit of the [[Karolinska Institute]] of [[Stockholm]] as research and training centre on human reproduction.<ref>{{Cite
Pleased by the progress made, the World Health Assembly requested the Director-General to consider a way to develop family planning services.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/91257|title=Health aspects of population dynamics|date=March 9, 1969|hdl=10665/91257 }}</ref> In 1970, the WHO launched a feasibility study about a global program of research on human reproduction. A report was thus presented in 1971 and advocated for a five ways action plan.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/361192/HR-71.4-Pt1-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y|title=World Health Organization: Expanded Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction: Report of a Feasibility Project, May 1971; HR/71.4 (1971) part 1.|hdl=10665/361192 }}</ref> First, the designation of four ''Research and Training Centres'', which would have to be leaders on the research on human reproduction in their respective region. Second, the collaboration with ''Clinical Research Centres'' to facilitate the clinical evaluation of new fertility regulating agents. Third, the creation of ''task Forces'' to conduct the research projects. Fourth, the creation of an international documentation centre on biomedical aspects of human reproduction (this point was not executed due to limited funding at the time). The
The Human Reproduction Unit was charged with the creation and administration of the new "Expanded Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction". In 1972, the World Health Assembly voted the WHA25.60 resolution "on
in biomedical research within the framework of the programmes being carried out by the Organization".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/91995?search-result=true&query=WHA25.60&scope=&rpp=10&sort_by=score&order=desc|title=World Health Organization: Resolution WHA25.60 on
==Expanded Programme of Research, Development, and Research Training in Human Reproduction==
Line 33:
In 1986, the structure of the Programme changed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/120636/em_rc33_13_en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y|title=World Health Organization: EM/RC33/13 - Nomination of a member state to the Policy and Coordination advisory committee (PCAC) of the Special programme of research, development, and research training in human reproduction (HRP), July 1986|hdl=10665/120636 }}</ref> The advisory Group was replaced by the Policy and Coordination Advisory Committee (PCAC), a consultative organ to the Director-General which made recommendations on issues linked to the policies, funding and general organization of the programme. It was composed of 30 members, twelve being the countries that contributed the most, twelve elected by the regional committees, three elected by the PCAC itself and the [[UNFPA]], [[World Bank]] and [[International Planned Parenthood Federation|IPPF]] as permanent members. The new structure also included the Scientific and Technical Advisory Group (STAG):<ref name=sponso>{{Cite web|url=https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/162389/EB81_22_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y|title=RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN HUMAN REPRODUCTION RESEARCH - Progress report by the Director-General |hdl=10665/162389 }}</ref> composed of 10 to 15 members (experts and scientists) it designated the Programme research priorities, the creation or end of a task Force, and gave an independent evaluation of all scientific and technical aspect of the Programme.
In 1988, the co-sponsorship of the Programme began:<ref name=sponso /> the [[UNDP]], [[UNFPA]], [[World Bank]] and the [[WHO]] were co-sponsors of the "UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction", commonly referred to as "the HRP". This had to objective to obtain consequent and stable funding for the Programme. The PCAC became the Policy and Coordination Committee (PCC), in charge of the administration, the approval of the budget, and the general orientation of the work of the Programme and included the co-sponsors as permanent members. A Standing Committee, composed of representatives of the co-sponsors meets thrice a year, monitors the Programme situation and formulates recommendations to the PCC. As the executive agency, the WHO nominates the director of the Programme and other non-elected members of the HRP after consulting the Standing Committee. The STAG had also now to report to the Standing Committee while the Review Group is replaced by the Research Project Review Panel which had similar attributions, but includes also the control of the financial aspect of the research projects.
Finally, in 1996, the Gender Advisory Panel was created in order to keep particular attention to issues linked to gender inequities, mutilations and violence based on sex and rights based on sexual practice and orientation.<ref>{{Cite journal|title="Righting the wrongs": addressing human rights and gender equality through research since Cairo|first1=Rajat|last1=Khosla|first2=Avni|last2=Amin|first3=Pascale|last3=Allotey|first4=Carmen|last4=Barroso|first5=Asha|last5=George|first6=Anita|last6=Hardon|first7=Ian|last7=Askew|date=January 1, 2019|journal=Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters|volume=27|issue=1|pages=329–332|doi=10.1080/26410397.2019.1676529|pmid=31746277|pmc=7887975}}</ref> It became the Gender and Rights Advisory Panel in 2007.
Line 46:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Hormonal contraception]]
|