Content deleted Content added
Copana2002 (talk | contribs) m moved technical template to Talk |
Tag: |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=|
{{WikiProject Computer science}}
}}
==Untitled==
The last line claims that BETA has an "optimal balance" between compile-time and run-time type checking. Sounds quite biased. Some people think Java has the optimal balance, while others think Smalltalk does. [[User:Wlievens|Wouter Lievens]] 14:57, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Line 6 ⟶ 10:
"It is well known that it is not possible to obtain complete type checking at compile-time without sacrificing the expressiveness of the language." This sounds quite adventurous to me. If this is true, I expect at least some short explanation, or better, a reference, backing up that claim. --[[Special:Contributions/89.54.183.96|89.54.183.96]] ([[User talk:89.54.183.96|talk]]) 21:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Newbie question: Searching for "beta programming language" sent me to an article about [[IBM 7950 Harvest]], which is a bit confusing. Is it possible to modify that result? [[User:Chei|Chei]] 13:50, 08 September 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to add that this article is an almost by word citation of a paper abstract; the paper can be found
[http://daimi.au.dk/~beta/Papers/BetaOverview/BetaOverview.pdf here (BETA-Overview)].
I don't have a problem with that, it should just SAY it somewhere to give credit.
--[[Special:Contributions/91.67.242.168|91.67.242.168]] ([[User talk:91.67.242.168|talk]]) 11:34, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
== I have programmed in BETA ==
I have actualled programmed in BETA in the beginning of the 90's in the university of
Aarhus, Denmark. I will try to dig up some more information about this programming language
[[User:TraxPlayer|TraxPlayer]] ([[User talk:TraxPlayer|talk]]) 21:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
| |||