Talk:BETA (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 11:34, 20 September 2009 edit 91.67.242.168 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:29, 24 January 2024 edit undo Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk \| contribs) Bots, Mass message senders 4,087,896 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26) Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=\| ~~{{technical}}~~ {{WikiProject Computer science}} }} ==Untitled== The last line claims that BETA has an "optimal balance" between compile-time and run-time type checking. Sounds quite biased. Some people think Java has the optimal balance, while others think Smalltalk does. [[User:Wlievens\|Wouter Lievens]] 14:57, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC) Line 10 ⟶ 14: I'd like to add that this article is an almost by word citation of a paper abstract; the paper can be found [http://daimi.au.dk/~beta/Papers/BetaOverview/BetaOverview.pdf here (BETA-Overview)]. I don't have a problem with that, it should just SAY it somewhere to give credit. --[[Special:Contributions/91.67.242.168\|91.67.242.168]] ([[User talk:91.67.242.168\|talk]]) 11:34, 20 September 2009 (UTC) == I have programmed in BETA == I have actualled programmed in BETA in the beginning of the 90's in the university of Aarhus, Denmark. I will try to dig up some more information about this programming language [[User:TraxPlayer\|TraxPlayer]] ([[User talk:TraxPlayer\|talk]]) 21:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)