Content deleted Content added
→Proposed merge: Asynchronous method invocation seems to be fairly substantial on its own. If Asynchronous method dispatch is confined to a small number of computer science papers, that is all the more reason to merge it here. |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computer science}}. Tag: |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Computer science }}
}}
{{merged-from|Asynchronous method dispatch|28 December 2017}}
==Proposed merge==
[[Asynchronous method dispatch]] is too short to stand on its own; it should be merged here. [[User:BD2412|<
:I'm not sure if we should actually keep that page. "Asynchronous method dispatch" doesn't occur as a phrase in GBooks. It seems to originate in [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=7048355286513193929&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 a paper by M. Henning] and has been picked up in a few other computer science works, but is mostly treated as a compositional phrase (method dispatch that is asynchronous). [[User:Qwertyus|Q<small>VVERTYVS</small>]] <small>([[User talk:Qwertyus|hm?]])</small> 14:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
:[[Asynchronous method invocation]] is also very close in scope to both articles... [[User:Qwertyus|Q<small>VVERTYVS</small>]] <small>([[User talk:Qwertyus|hm?]])</small> 14:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
::[[Asynchronous method invocation]] seems to be fairly substantial on its own. If [[Asynchronous method dispatch]] is confined to a small number of computer science papers, that is all the more reason to merge it here and basically squish it into a footnote. [[User:BD2412|<
:::Agreed and {{done}} [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 21:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
| |||