Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.2) (Balon Greyjoy) |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Weather}}. Tag: |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Weather|importance=|met-data-task-force=yes}}
}}
I am slowly adding links to the data repositories for these datasets and the relevant wikipedia articles. [[User:Dlary|Dlary]] 14:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Line 55 ⟶ 56:
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 04:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
== Scope, additional entries ==
This has already been mentioned, but there are an overwhelming number of atmospheric chemistry observations that this article misses. Off the top of my head: (ground based) TCCON, the NOAA/ESRL surface network, (satellite based) SCIAMACHY, AIRS, MOPITT, IASI, GOSAT, OCO-2. There is also NOAA's ObsPack which is an integrated collection of measurements of carbon species. I believe GAW produces a similar product.
The aircraft section does a good job of linking to NASA's EVS because there are a ton of campaigns.
I could go about adding a lot of these, but I think the article would get really messy. So my question is what should the scope of this article be? Should it focus on all measurements? Just database collections? Should there be some sort of table for different measurements instead of paragraph-long text-based descriptions?
[[User:Briardew|briardew]] ([[User talk:Briardew|talk]]) 15:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
| |||