Talk:Stochastic dynamic programming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:25, 27 March 2017

Latest revision as of 04:34, 27 January 2024

(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Computing |science=y |science-importance=Low |software=y |software-importance=Low |class=Start |importance=Low}}

{{Maths rating |class=StartWikiProject Mathematics|priority=Low}}

}}

== Addressing [[Template:Technical]] - explanation missing ==

{{reply to|Zakhx150}} I have found [[Template:Technical]] added to the [[Stochastic dynamic programming]] onin the{{oldid|Stochastic 6thDynamic of March 2017Programming‎|768903985}}. Unfortunately, no additional explanation was provided in the edit summary or on the talk page. Wikipedia guidance states:

Wikipedia guidance states:

<blockquote>

When adding this template, explain the issue in the edit summary or on the talk page. Without such explanation, editors with the knowledge to fix the issue often cannot address the issue as they do not know why the template was added in the first place.

Line 17:

--[[User:Dr.roberto.rossi|Dr.roberto.rossi]] ([[User talk:Dr.roberto.rossi|talk]]) 01:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

:{{u|Dr.roberto.rossi}} - My apologies for the lazy flagging earlier on. Frankly the vast majority of this page makes very little sense to me as a member of the great unwashed masses, but I can appreciate that its technicality is born, at least in part, out of necessity. The example section is appreciated, so thanks there. Perhaps an expansion of the lead paragraph using [[WP:EXPLAINLEAD|less technical jargon]]. For example: "a branch of stochastic programming that takes a functional equation approach to the discovery of optimum policies for this class of problems" may be entirely accurate I am none the wiser what this means. I suspect this is where my technical flag came from - a holistic generalisation that very little of the article made sense to me as an Arts graduate.[[User:Zakhx150|Zakhx150]] ([[User talk:Zakhx150|talk]]) 13:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

::{{u|Zakhx150}} - Many thanks for your clarification. I have now tried to remove as much as possible jargon from the first paragraph. Where is has not been possible, I linked relevant pages that provide necessary background. --[[User:Dr.roberto.rossi|Dr.roberto.rossi]] ([[User talk:Dr.roberto.rossi|talk]]) 20:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)