Content deleted Content added
Visionhelp (talk | contribs) |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computing}}. Tag: |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=}}
}}
==[Untitled]==
GPT-MBR goes to the all-your-base meme page. This probably isnt what you wanted.
Line 68 ⟶ 69:
So, there is still a gap with GPT, practically, because of good-practice Alignment (typically 1MB) and this gap may be used with fitting or encompassing Partition or without. But without, it may be even less reliable und undefined as the 63-block MBR-gap. Furthermore with GPT it is not to bold to claim a partition, where in MBR this would have cost 1 of only 4 primary partitions. Just saying/thinking. --[[User:Itu|Itu]] ([[User talk:Itu|talk]]) 10:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
== SSD-Drive with GPT, not accessable by XP (sorry), by BIOS I do not know ==
My starting point is knowing only [[Master_boot_record|MBR]]. But without a knowing what is a good workable with superordinate, genus. <br>
Line 79 ⟶ 80:
To let it others know, I just do note it now here. But I cannot do the efforts to look for sources to it now, sorry. But in hope, my works and figuring outs, already may be a help. <br>
Thanks the interesst. <br>
--[[User:Visionhelp|Visionhelp]] ([[User talk:Visionhelp|talk]]) 11:27, 31 August 2021 (UTC) <br>
Sorry, found now this: is my comment perhaps better placed there [[GUID_Partition_Table]]? Thanks. <br>
--[[User:Visionhelp|Visionhelp]] ([[User talk:Visionhelp|talk]]) 11:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
| |||