Talk:Block scheduling: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Moving uncited material to talk page pending additions of proper citations per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al.
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Education}}.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject Educationbanner shell|class=C |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Education |importance=Low}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_New_Haven/English_1112-45L_Introduction_to_Academic_Inquiry_and_Writing_(Fall_2018) | assignments = [[User:Wblai1|Wblai1]] | start_date = 2018-08-27 | end_date = 2018-12-28 }}
}}
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2018-08-27">27 August 2018</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2018-12-28">28 December 2018</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_New_Haven/English_1112-45L_Introduction_to_Academic_Inquiry_and_Writing_(Fall_2018)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Wblai1|Wblai1]].
 
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 15:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}}
==POV issues==
This article appears to take a pro-block scheduling stance, talking about "wasted" time between class periods and mentioning only the advantages of block scheduling, without mentioning the disadvantages. As such, I've tagged with a {{tl|POV}} tag. I may get a chance to work on the POV myself but I can't right now. [[User:LtPowers|Powers]] <sup><small><small>[[User talk:LtPowers|T]]</small></small></sup> 15:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Line 7 ⟶ 11:
 
This article seems to be anti-block scheduling. There is very little support for block scheduling. Under "Effectiveness" there is no support for block scheduling. There should be both sides under this, probably split in two sub-sections, one fro pros and one for cons. [[User:Holycow958|Holycow958]] 21:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
:It does need two sides...(but block schedules suck anyways ;)) --<fontspan colorstyle="color: green"; font-family: face="Berling Antiqua;">hello, i'm a [[User:Member|<fontspan colorstyle="color: orange;">member</fontspan>]]</fontspan> | [[User talk:Member|<fontspan colorstyle="color: grey;">talk to me!</fontspan>]] 23:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
:I agree, it seems very one-sided, anti-block scheduling. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/66.31.47.44|66.31.47.44]] ([[User talk:66.31.47.44|talk]]) 01:25, 29 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I also agree. This article article is clearly against block scheduling!--[[Special:Contributions/98.220.124.133|98.220.124.133]] ([[User talk:98.220.124.133|talk]]) 00:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)