Talk:Blocks (C language extension): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 19:39, 7 July 2011 edit 76.102.102.19 (talk) →Relation to C++ Lambda functions in GCC and other mainstream compilers: new section ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 00:35, 29 January 2024 edit undo Cewbot (talk \| contribs) Bots 8,375,914 edits m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Computer science}}, {{WikiProject Apple Inc.}}. Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: {{Talk header}} {{WikiProject Computer science\|class=\|importance=Mid}}▼ {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\| ▲{{WikiProject Computer science~~\|class=~~\|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject Apple Inc.\|importance=Low}} }} This page should not mention Grand Central Dispatch more than mentioning that it optionally uses blocks. The many GCD references only serve to further confuse the two. --[[User:Devnevyn\|Devnevyn]] ([[User talk:Devnevyn\|talk]]) 08:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Line 22 ⟶ 26: :I've integrated your text above into the article. Thanks! -- [[User:The Anome\|The Anome]] ([[User talk:The Anome\|talk]]) 11:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC) : 3 years later, I have to say this part adds nothing to the article. If you never thought that these concepts were the same then it is confusing why the nested functions are being brought up. I am not sure why one person's previous flawed understanding means everyone has to see it in the article. - [[Special:Contributions/70.36.139.84\|70.36.139.84]] ([[User talk:70.36.139.84\|talk]]) 13:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC) == Relation to C++ Lambda functions in GCC and other mainstream compilers == Looks like the mainstream of compilers for C/C++ are about to make "Blocks" or "~~Lambada~~Lambda" functions part of the 4.5 of the GCC compiler. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/349899/what-c-compilers-are-supporting-lambda-already Lambda is part of the C++0x (C++ language definition update) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x == External links modified == Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on [[Blocks (C language extension)]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=791704517 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot\|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: *Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090920043909/http://images.apple.com/macosx/technology/docs/GrandCentral_TB_brief_20090903.pdf to http://images.apple.com/macosx/technology/docs/GrandCentral_TB_brief_20090903.pdf When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. {{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}} Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot\|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot\|Report bug]])</span> 23:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC) == Mention possible inclusion in C2x? == The standards committee has mentioned bringing in blocks to the next official version of C (tentatively scheduled for early 202x) -- would that be appropriate the bring up in the page or is it too speculative? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/23.241.197.166\|23.241.197.166]] ([[User talk:23.241.197.166#top\|talk]]) 07:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->